was to chown the files to nobody:nobody
(and, yes, I had the directory permissions set to 777 too.)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lindell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:17 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: exim4 + forwarding
Jul 26 07:58:20 vps spamd[7361]: spamd: result: . 2 -
HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
Jul 26 07:58:21 vps spamd[7361]: spamd: result: Y 7 -
BAYES_99,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SUR
BL
There are two obvious differences here, Bayes and the forged header
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 26 07:58:20 vps spamd[7361]: spamd: result: . 2 -
HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
Jul 26 07:58:21 vps spamd[7361]: spamd: result: Y 7 -
BAYES_99,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SUR
BL
There are two obvious differences
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I've never seen the logic of placing SpamAssassin inside the incoming
transaction before the termination of the SMTP connection rather than
down the pipe in the MDA.
If you want to 'reject spam' (wih score over a given
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:05 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin
Your first scan is running as nobody (that's bad) but the second is
running as szinski. That would
From: Chr. v. Stuckrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I've never seen the logic of placing SpamAssassin inside the incoming
transaction before the termination of the SMTP connection rather than
down the pipe in the MDA.
If you
jdow wrote:
From: Chr. v. Stuckrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I've never seen the logic of placing SpamAssassin inside the incoming
transaction before the termination of the SMTP connection rather than
down the pipe in the
Well, guys, I think I resolved my problem. Since exim runs under the
nobody account (I could not get it to run as another user, believe me,
I tried!), I simply copied all of the bayes files from a known working
account to /.spamassassin and chown'ed them to nobody. Everything is
working great now
You could have just chmoded the directorys and files to 744
-Original Message-
From: Zinski, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:37 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin
Well, guys, I think I resolved my
I need some help trying to figure out why spamassassin scores the same
message differently.
I am using an ACL with exim4 to scan email during the actual smtp
connection (so I can reject spam before my server accepts it). It's
pretty straightforward. My ACL looks like this:
# Reject messages
Your first scan is running as nobody (that's bad) but the second is running as szinski. That would
explain the BAYES_99. I'm not sure about the FORGED_RCVD_HELO and HTML_50_60 though.
Zinski, Steve wrote:
I need some help trying to figure out why spamassassin scores the same
message
+ forwarding + spamassassin
Your first scan is running as nobody (that's bad) but the second is
running as szinski. That would explain the BAYES_99. I'm not sure
about the FORGED_RCVD_HELO and HTML_50_60 though.
Zinski, Steve wrote:
I need some help trying to figure out why spamassassin scores
12 matches
Mail list logo
