mouss writes:
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
backscatter is
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all doing
that from a dialup. what's the point of that? testing spambots?
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all doing
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 15:17:29 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.05.08 21:49, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback
that claims i sent a
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
backscatter is what happens if mail systems automaticly reply to forged From:
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
backscatter is what happens if mail systems
On 13.05.08 15:17, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
It's not backscatter. Please see read the message again, you'll see that
it actually _pretends_ to be backscatter. I'm just asking here becouse i
wondered why somone would do that.
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:51:50 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I've looked at it and I've (probably) missed it (again). Why do you think
that it pretends to look like backscatter, and why do you think it is not?
On 13.05.08 19:09, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
backscatter is what happens
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 22:45:43 mouss wrote:
That said, one possibility is this: Some soho have an MSA on a dsl line.
a ratwared box inside (or a web service running on the MSA box) sends
mail to an invalid recipient. the MSA gets rejected and then sends you
an NDR. the MSA is borked
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 22:45:43 mouss wrote:
That said, one possibility is this: Some soho have an MSA on a dsl line.
a ratwared box inside (or a web service running on the MSA box) sends
mail to an invalid recipient. the MSA gets rejected and then sends you
I've got those:
http://rafb.net/p/q3eZwd93.html
anyone can see any sense in it? it uses my hostname to fake a bounceback that
claims i sent a message to another faked address, while all doing that from a
dialup. what's the point of that? testing spambots?
--
best regards/Mit freundlichen
12 matches
Mail list logo
