> > what does clamav checking in that scanner do then? It should call
> > clamdscan
> > asap (before SA) and when a virus is found, the mail should be imediately
> > rejected, the same way it's rejected when SA tells so.
On 23.07.07 20:31, Robert - eLists wrote:
> It quarantines and notifies admin
>
> what does clamav checking in that scanner do then? It should call
> clamdscan
> asap (before SA) and when a virus is found, the mail should be imediately
> rejected, the same way it's rejected when SA tells so.
>
Matus
It quarantines and notifies admin via email. Real PAIN
If you read the
Nigel
SA integrated via qmail-scanner-queue.pl allows smtp rejection based upon
score thresholds
- rh
There are a number of qmail specific programs that use clamav other
than qmail-scanner (which, based on a quick skim of their page,
doesn't seem to support SMTP-time rejection). The ClamAV website has
several alternatives, a couple of which appear to do SMTP-time
rejection, listed at
http://www.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 7:27 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: migrating from clamav before mta to SA ClamAV
> plugin experiences
>
> On 23.07.07 10:59, Nigel
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:32:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >however according to his informations, his qmail queue scanner rejects the
> >mail if it's spam, but not if it's virus (which is sick and a bug imho)
On 23.07.07 10:59, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Ahh - it's n
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:32:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >On 22.07.07 15:32, Robert - eLists wrote:
>> >> I use qmail-scanner-queue.pl, clamav, spamassassin and qmail
>> >>
>> >> I can reject spam over a certain scoring threshold this way, yet I have
>> >> not
>>
> >On 22.07.07 15:32, Robert - eLists wrote:
> >> I use qmail-scanner-queue.pl, clamav, spamassassin and qmail
> >>
> >> I can reject spam over a certain scoring threshold this way, yet I have not
> >> figured out a way to just reject email based upon having a virus signature
> >> per clamav.
> O
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:47 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > which MTA are you using? The clamav plugin should reject the e-mail the
>> > same way SA plugin does that (with much less CPU time spent)
>
>On 22.07.07 15:32, Robert - eLists wrote:
>> Uhlar
>
>... and I th
> > which MTA are you using? The clamav plugin should reject the e-mail the
> > same way SA plugin does that (with much less CPU time spent)
On 22.07.07 15:32, Robert - eLists wrote:
> Uhlar
... and I thought that spelling my surname in capitals would preserver from
this title ... :)
> I use qma
>
> which MTA are you using? The clamav plugin should reject the e-mail the
> same
> way SA plugin does that (with much less CPU time spent)
>
Uhlar
I use qmail-scanner-queue.pl, clamav, spamassassin and qmail
I can reject spam over a certain scoring threshold this way, yet I have not
figured
On 22.07.07 13:16, Robert - eLists wrote:
> Would anyone care to share their experiences of migrating from having their
> pre MTA program handoff to clamav for email virus scanning changed to doing
> it with the SA ClamAV plugin way ???
>
> The reason I am thinking about migrating and doing it wit
Would anyone care to share their experiences of migrating from having their
pre MTA program handoff to clamav for email virus scanning changed to doing
it with the SA ClamAV plugin way ???
The reason I am thinking about migrating and doing it with the SA ClamAV
plugin way is that I can just rejec
13 matches
Mail list logo
