On 2021-02-11 14:56, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do work if sendgrid did not allow non
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 2/9/21 10:03 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
got one more today
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do work if sendgrid did not allow non sendgrid.net envelope
senders :(
KAM_SENDGRID_REDIR
On 2/9/21 10:03 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
>
> got one more today
>
> http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
>
> envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
>
> spamurls to the phishing is
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
>
> got one more today
>
> http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
>
> envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
>
> spamurls to
On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
got one more today
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
spamurls to the phishing is sendgrid redir to hide all detalts of spam
domain
why is so
Does anyone have a copy of the netflix phishing that they could forward to me
at amitch...@isipp.com, including the body of it?
TIA!
Anne
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:04 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
>
>
On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
too much phishing in winter half year to my taste
i just google report urls now, and still add to phishtank, hopefully
phishers get a real life
you can safely add 1.5 more to KAM_SENDGRID, if it
Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
On 1/19/2021 9:07 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i have added urls to phishtank
if its could be added rules to spamassassin to detect it better i can
send sample to sa pmc members
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.9, required=5.0, Autolearn=no
i have added urls to phishtank
if its could be added rules to spamassassin to detect it better i can
send sample to sa pmc members
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.9, required=5.0, Autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no,
LastExt=149.72.91.245
X-Spam-Rules_score:
11 matches
Mail list logo
