wonder why this is patentable? sounds like preque filtering available in
every mta since the early 90's...
looks for 'helo/mailfrom/recpt to' then drops or accepts connection.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7490128.html
United States Patent 7490128
Abstract:
The spam blocker monitors the
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:24 PM
wonder why this is patentable? sounds like preque filtering available
in
every mta since the early 90's...
looks for 'helo/mailfrom/recpt to' then drops or accepts
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:24 PM
wonder why this is patentable?
Perhaps just because someone has the Chutzpah to try to patent it and
the patent office hasn't a clue.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:54 -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Perhaps just because someone has the Chutzpah to try to patent it and
the patent office hasn't a clue. Technology of all sorts has moved too
quickly for the patent office and/or the patent laws to keep up. Another
example is a U.S.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
wonder why this is patentable?
Loads of things are patentable in the meaning that someone
manages to get a patent. That doesn't mean the patent can
witstand a challenge.
You never know for sure wether a patent (or a trademark) is fully
valid until it is is
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 17:01 -0600, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:54 -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Perhaps just because someone has the Chutzpah to try to patent it and
the patent office hasn't a clue. Technology of all sorts has moved too
quickly for the patent office
Michael Scheidell a écrit :
wonder why this is patentable? sounds like preque filtering available in
every mta since the early 90's...
looks for 'helo/mailfrom/recpt to' then drops or accepts connection.
- if their spam blocker is linked in the MTA or is a firewall, then
this has been done
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 17:01 -0600, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:54 -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Perhaps just because someone has the Chutzpah to try to patent it and
the patent office hasn't a clue. Technology of all sorts has moved too
quickly for
