Am 19.07.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Jan-Kees van Kampen:
FWIW all three of those messages came from sources that are on multiple
IP-based block-lists (DNSBLs) such as spamhaus.net, spamcop.net, &
abuseat.org.
If you were using those methods for filtering (either via postfix
filtering or
SA scoring)
> FWIW all three of those messages came from sources that are on multiple
> IP-based block-lists (DNSBLs) such as spamhaus.net, spamcop.net, &
> abuseat.org.
>
> If you were using those methods for filtering (either via postfix
> filtering or
> SA scoring) those messages shouldn't have made it th
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jan-Kees van Kampen wrote:
Hi John,
It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like
pastebin or a webserver you control and send the URLs to the list so
that we can see the complete raw messages.
here are 3 examples:
http://sandberg.nl/sp/
1 and 2
Hi John,
> It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like
> pastebin or a webserver you control and send the URLs to the list so
> that we can see the complete raw messages.
here are 3 examples:
http://sandberg.nl/sp/
1 and 2 have the pattern I described before,
3 is anot
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jan-Kees van Kampen wrote:
I wrote:
attachmentname.split($.)[1] == ".zip/.docx"
but I meant of course:
attachmentname.split($.).last == "zip" or "docx" ...
Sorry if i'm spamming the list ;)
It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like
pastebi
hello list,
I wonder how it would be possible to filter a particular spam,
it's not triggering scores, but so omnipresent that I suspect more
people have had to deal with it one way or another.
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask,
and please tell me if I should go elsewhere with my que
I wrote:
> attachmentname.split($.)[1] == ".zip/.docx"
but I meant of course:
attachmentname.split($.).last == "zip" or "docx" ...
Sorry if i'm spamming the list ;)
