Re: rule for To: undisclosed-recipients:;

2010-10-25 Thread Cedric Knight
On 25/10/10 04:21, Dennis German wrote: Is there? should there be a rule for a header like: To: undisclosed-recipients:; There was a rule UNDISC_RECIPS in version 3.1, and it scored about 0.8 points. I don't know why it was removed; presumably it hit too much ham. It used to go: header

Re: rule for To: undisclosed-recipients:;

2010-10-25 Thread Darxus
On 10/24, Dennis German wrote: Is there? should there be a rule for a header like: To: undisclosed-recipients:; There is a meta rule in spamassassin version 3.3.1: header __TO_UNDISCLOSEDTo =~ /(?:undisclosed-recipients|destinataires inconnus):/i It has no score on its own, and

rule for To: undisclosed-recipients:;

2010-10-24 Thread Dennis German
Is there? should there be a rule for a header like: To: undisclosed-recipients:;