Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >>> Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
> >
> > I posted this a while ago:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
> >
> > It's e
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
I posted this a while ago:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
It's even linked in from the Development Information link. :)
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
I posted this a while ago:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
It's even linked in from the Development Information link. :)
> http://wiki.apache.
Justin Mason wrote:
Hi guys --
yes, I think you're right -- it looks like SpamAssassin 3.1.x rule
updates are not generated automatically, unlike the trunk ones :(
Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
You've got to roll your own.
- commit changes to rules/branches/3.1/ and
Kenneth Porter writes:
> --On Friday, November 03, 2006 5:43 PM + Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.
>
> I don't see it either. What's the name of the rule?
for what it's worth, it's 'RCVD_FORGED_WROTE'.
> Dates on fi
d, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 November 2006 01:19
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: Justin Mason
> Subject: sa-update DNS not updated (was: Block "wrote:" spams)
>
> --On Friday, November 03, 200
--On Friday, November 03, 2006 5:43 PM + Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.
I don't see it either. What's the name of the rule?
Dates on files in /var/lib/spamassassin are 20061024.
I ran sa-update -D and got this at the en
