Jo Rhett wrote:
Is there any difference here that I'm overlooking? Any advantage to RDJ?
And leading to my next point, given that sa-update is working fine --
isn't rdj going to be slimmed down to just the part that restarts the
process after running sa-update?
Hi Jo,
I'm the author of
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the official tool since no one ever submitted
RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the official tool since no one
ever submitted
RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
I'm glad it isn't the official tool since it doesn't run natively on
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the official tool since no one ever
submitted RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
I'm glad it isn't the official tool
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to be
as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living), which is
why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more efficient...
[snip]
Thank you very much for the detailed
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of real
interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short, all I
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights
Title: RE: sa-update versus rulesdujour questions
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic
is of real
interest to me...
Last month this topic blew up into a flame fest. I compltely understand why no on wants in on this again.
Short answer: use what you like
Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone
Jake Vickers wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
...
I use RDJ myself, and also did not add anything to my local.cf to make
it work. I adjusted some scores, but that was all.
Me three. As many changes as I've
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Last month this topic blew up into a flame fest. I compltely
understand why
no on wants in on this again.
Oops. I should have checked the archive.
Short answer: use what you like.
Of course. I was just wondering if there was certain
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did
you have to change?
Reading RDJ setup, it kept mentioning that I would have to add
statements to local.conf for each and every ruleset that I imported.
This is why I
... snip ...
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
* TRUSTED_RULESETS=TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:14 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
*
Jo Rhett wrote:
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
You missed the previous line:
Create a blank configuration file
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you
have to change?
Reading RDJ setup, it kept mentioning that I would have to add
statements to local.conf for each and every ruleset that I imported.
This
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of
real interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:42:26PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
They are both good. RDJ was made to deal with third party rulesets
and it does a good job. sa-update was made to deal with official
ruleset updates and has been extended to also handle third party
rulesets.
That's not exactly
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to be
as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living), which is
why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more efficient...
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know that there is much difference in the
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to
be as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living),
which is why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more
efficient...
I wasn't intending to advocate either. I was just
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short, all
I did was make a file with a list of rulefiles that SA-Update should
check, and everything worked without
21 matches
Mail list logo
