sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
I think there's some kind of conflict between sa-update and RulesDuJour that has borked my spamassassin installation, but I can't figure out how. This morning after RDJ restarted spamd, spamc started returning messages with ONLY the spamassassin version header added, not the score report.

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 5/13/06, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think there's some kind of conflict between sa-update and RulesDuJour that has borked my spamassassin installation, but I can't figure out how. Apparently the conflict is only that RDJ restarts spamd automatically, but sa-update does not.

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: Apparently the conflict is only that RDJ restarts spamd automatically, but sa-update does not. I don't believe there's a conflict there, but yes, sa-update does not auto-restart spamd. Default configuration data is loaded

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 5/13/06, Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: Well, guess what. sa-update creates the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001 directory if it does not exist, rather than finding the directory that does exist and using that. I

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:27:14PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: But surely there's some kind of disconnect here. sa-update creates an empty directory that spamassassin (and spamd) then uses preferentially to the one that really has the rules in it. It's not empty if the download is successful.

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 5/13/06, Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not empty if the download is successful. I believe there's a ticket about changing the behavior so an empty directory isn't left behind if the first attempt to do an update fails. Sounds good. In that case I would argue that either

Re: sa-update vs. RDJ -- Default rules directory changed somehow?

2006-05-13 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:06:02PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: Was there an update available on May 8? There've been updates available for a while now. Since before 3.1.1 came out, which was at the start of March. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: I didn't know Allman was a stand-up comedian ...