Re: sare channels

jdow wrote: There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces. :-) Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it and then don't realize it. Ted {^_-} - Original Message - From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net Sent:

RE: sare channels

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:35 -0700, Gary Smith wrote: Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were migrated into the mainline or something like that. It's been years since I really had to

Re: sare channels

Gary Smith a écrit : Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? you should use 90_2tld_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net to avoid querying

Re: sare channels

There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces. {^_-} - Original Message - From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net Sent: Thursday, 2009/August/20 17:25 Dave wrote: Hi, Thanks. If the sare rules work great, is it standard practice to use them and

Re: sare channels

Dave wrote: Hello, I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it moved? Thanks. Dave. Read the top

RE: sare channels

Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?

Re: sare channels

Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? Try them and if they work, great. Ted

RE: sare channels

Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE

Re: sare channels

, August 20, 2009 2:29 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them

Re: sare channels

Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using sa-update

RE: sare channels

There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using sa-update on them regularly is utterly pointless.. Matt, Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were migrated into

sare channels

Hello, I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it moved? Thanks. Dave.

sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

i've SA 317 installed on OSX 10.4.8. i currently use RDJ to update SARE rules w/o error. i use sa-update w/ channel=updates.spamassassin.org, also w/o error. i'm switching to SARE updates via sa-update DOS's channels. on exec of sa-update + SARE channels, i get multiple errors (warnings

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

OpenMacNews wrote: i've SA 317 installed on OSX 10.4.8. i currently use RDJ to update SARE rules w/o error. i use sa-update w/ channel=updates.spamassassin.org, also w/o error. i'm switching to SARE updates via sa-update DOS's channels. on exec of sa-update + SARE channels, i get multiple

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

after a clean install of SA 317, my DATADIR ((...)/SA/Dist/) contains: What's this DATADIR? Are you referring to what would normally be something like /var/lib/spamassassin/ ? DATADIR is what i've specified as my DATADIR @ build time. from (distro)/3.1/README: File Locations: SpamAssassin

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

. unknown reason, The reason is that that's my understanding of the documentation. I'm not entirely sure which documentation you are referring to. The sa-update documentation doesn't seem to suggest that the default --updatedir is the same as the default DATADIR. The how-to for the SARE channels

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

following up with actual tests of each of the aforementioned cases: (a) *not* define --updatedir (b) define --updatedir=$DATADIR (c) define --updatedir=$CONFDIR (d) define --updatedir=$somewhereelse for an sa-update run, given my build config of: perl Makefile.PL \

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

If you're seeing subroutine redefined warnings you're loading the same rules more than once, period. Run spamassassin --lint -D and make note of what directories it's loading rules from. Then go and blow away those directories (be careful not to delete things you don't have a copy of... like

Re: sa-update of SARE channels returns multiple Subroutine ... redefined at ... errors

starting a clean build where my init dir contains only: % ls -1R /var/SA Local/ rules_du_jour.conf sa-update-channels.txt ./Local: ImageInfo.pm init.pre