Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10.07.08 13:49, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote: I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes confidence is 0-1% for the spam so it is getting a -2.6. It is hitting on the following rules -2.60 BAYES_00Bayesian spam

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-14 Thread Matthias Leisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kathryn Kleinschafer schrieb: | Am I supposed to reload a service or is there something else I have missed? Yes, every change to a *.cf or *.pre file requires a restart of spamd (as opposed to the standalone spamassassin binary, which will read

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-13 Thread mouss
Alex Woick wrote: BAYES_00 means that the bayes engine thinks the message is definitely not spam. If this rule is hitting on spam messages, you have a problem. Unless this is just a really hammy looking spam, you may want to consider retraining your bayes database. And regardless, you should

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-13 Thread Kathryn Kleinschafer
Hi, Our system does train Ham and I do train spam that gets through (where possible). I thought though that training say 5 emails as spam (assuming they were all the same) won't necessarily change the Bayes confidence, is this not correct? Kate Bowie Bailey wrote: Alex Woick wrote:

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-13 Thread Kathryn Kleinschafer
Hi Jared, Thanks for the help. I have made the file LOCALK.cf in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/ folder and run spamassassin --lint (no errors) However when I test the message it is not hitting the rule. Am I supposed to reload a service or is there something else I have missed? Thanks Kate Jared

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-13 Thread Kathryn Kleinschafer
Sorry not sure what I was doing wrong before but it is hitting now. Thanks Kate Jared Hall wrote: header LOCAL_REMINDERSubject =~ /^REMINDER NOTIFICATION/ score LOCAL_REMINDER5.0 Regards, Jared Hall General Telecom, LLC. Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have

RE: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-10 Thread Bowie Bailey
Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes confidence is 0-1% for the spam so it is getting a -2.6. It is hitting on the following rules -2.60 BAYES_00Bayesian spam probability is

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-10 Thread Alex Woick
BAYES_00 means that the bayes engine thinks the message is definitely not spam. If this rule is hitting on spam messages, you have a problem. Unless this is just a really hammy looking spam, you may want to consider retraining your bayes database. And regardless, you should always manually

RE: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-10 Thread Bowie Bailey
Alex Woick wrote: BAYES_00 means that the bayes engine thinks the message is definitely not spam. If this rule is hitting on spam messages, you have a problem. Unless this is just a really hammy looking spam, you may want to consider retraining your bayes database. And regardless, you

spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-09 Thread Kathryn Kleinschafer
Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes confidence is 0-1% for the spam so it is getting a -2.6. It is hitting on the following rules -2.60 BAYES_00Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% -0.19 CRM114_CHECK 2.17

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-09 Thread Jared Hall
header LOCAL_REMINDERSubject =~ /^REMINDER NOTIFICATION/ score LOCAL_REMINDER5.0 Regards, Jared Hall General Telecom, LLC. Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

2008-07-09 Thread Sahil Tandon
Kathryn Kleinschafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. [...] The subject line is always REMINDER NOTIFICATION In order to get it recognised as spam am I best to have a custom rule for the