On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 02:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
>
> I've spent some time and tried to refine my rules based on your
> advice, guenther. Can I ask you to check them over again and see if
> this is any better, or at least more inclusive?
The
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 03:00 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> > (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
>
> I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
> second time. I was looki
On 20-Aug-2009, at 10:51, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
mails:
http://pastebin.ca/1536577
You removed far too many headers for anyone to make a meaningful
comparison.
--
Can I borrow your underpants for 10 minutes?
Hi,
> mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
second time. I was looking around for the (new) right way to do it,
and found this in 80_addit
Hi,
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPEG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/
>
> All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
I've spent some time and tried to r
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:58:02 -0500
Chris wrote:
> Ran it through sa-learn as spam, spamassassn -r and -t which scored
> much better:
> ...
>
> 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
Unfortunately that's not a good guide to future performance. Most spams
contain a l
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:47 +0200, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but I'm new
> to the list, and I've been searching before about it with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of incoming spam with an attached image which is flag
> styled (as the
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:07 PM, MySQL Student wrote:
mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
score AS_090508_CTYP_JPG 0.5
describe AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Rule by AS: Content-Type: JPG
This can probably be scored higher than the others. image/jpg isn't
a valid
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
> A few of these have slipped through on my systems, but for the most
> part, these rules have worked here:
>
> mimeheader AS_090505_CDIS_INLINE Content-Disposition =~ /inline/
> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
> mimeh
Hi,
> Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old styled
> spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing, I understand
> because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes, if it have.
A few of these have slipped through on my systems, but for the m
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Marc Mu?oz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-mails:
http: //pastebin.ca/1536577
http: //pastebin.ca/1536583
The headers on both of those spamples have been severely abridged. You
need to figure out how to get the comple
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:51 +0200, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
> Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two
> e-mails:
>
>
The two I looked at in any detail made it obvious the From: address was
forged because it didn't agree with the earliest Received: header: not
even t
-style JPEG
that works well with my settings.
Those two with only 2 prices are new to me. And there isn't enough
occurrences of the offending words to match with my settings in FuzzyOcr :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-with-flagged-style-images-tp25059821
Hello again. Thanks for your answers.
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
mails:
http://pastebin.ca/1536577
http://pastebin.ca/1536583
Regards,
--
Marc Muñoz ~ http://www.atcubic.com
Tel. 902464246
Fax. 933967266
El 20/08/2009, a las 13:22, Martin Hep
ket, I'll try to produce a
clean patch to FuzzyOcr & attach it & my scansets/preps to the ticket.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-with-flagged-style-images-tp25059821p25064803.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
with no success.
I
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
> I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
> with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of
2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but I'm new to the
> list, and I've been searching before about it with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of incoming spam with an attached image which is flag styled
> (as the one attached).
>
> Text added to e
Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but I'm new
to the list, and I've been searching before about it with no success.
I'm having lot of incoming spam with an attached image which is flag
styled (as the one attached).
Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated,
19 matches
Mail list logo