Am 01.06.2016 um 17:33 schrieb Andy Balholm:
> I have gotten a few responses now on the spamass-milter mailing list, but
> none of them is from a project member or maintainer.
>
> I have put a copy of the spamass-milter source at
> https://github.com/andybalholm/spamass-milter. Feel free to file
I have gotten a few responses now on the spamass-milter mailing list, but none
of them is from a project member or maintainer.
I have put a copy of the spamass-milter source at
https://github.com/andybalholm/spamass-milter. Feel free to file issues or pull
requests there. If/when a spamass-milt
On 26 May 2016, at 13:53, Andy Balholm wrote:
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the
de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail
or Postfix,
On 28.05.16 17:34, Bill Cole wrote:
I'm not sure that's really true. I
On 26 May 2016, at 13:53, Andy Balholm wrote:
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the
de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or
Postfix,
I'm not sure that's really true. I've never seen any sort of surveys,
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Another one came onto my mind:
abuse@ address separation.
- mail to abuse@ should not be rejected as spam, even it it might be scanned
(it might be spam report and those should not be rejected)
- spams to abuse@ and other addresses should not
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Another one came onto my mind:
abuse@ address separation.
- mail to abuse@ should not be rejected as spam, even it it might be scanned
(it might be spam report and those should not be rejected)
- spams to abuse@ and other addresses should not
...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Andy Balholm wrote:
What do you mean?
On 26.05.16 13:37, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
Yes, I eventually discovered -a in the help text. But it’s not in the man page.
I sent a mail to the spamass-milt mailing list (and the maintainers) first, and
got no response. It was the first post to that list since September 2014.
Andy
Am 26.05.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Andy Balholm:
I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has
happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been
responded to.
The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented o
I know about the 0.4.0 release in 2014 (almost two years ago). But nothing has
happened since then, except the filing of a couple of issues that have not been
responded to.
The only real issue I have run into is that the -a flag is not documented on
the man page. If it looked like the project w
Am 26.05.2016 um 23:12 schrieb Andy Balholm:
Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt
Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22
guess from where the Fedora main
Where are those updates? There is nothing less than 20 months old at
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/spamass-milt/?root=spamass-milt
Is this the Fedora changelog? It talks about upstream, and mentions Fedora 22.
Andy
Am 26.05.2016 um 20:37 schrieb sha...@shanew.net:
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is
that four(?) SA headers are kept, but ever
I hope he means a mechanism by which spamass-milter will allow
specified (in the config, not in the code) SA headers to actually get
added when they pass through spamass-milter. The current behavior is
that four(?) SA headers are kept, but everything else is discarded.
I've wanted something like
> ...some other headers to be pushed to mail SA generates
What do you mean?
Andy
On 26.05.16 10:53, Andy Balholm wrote:
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the
de-facto standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or
Postfix, but it is woefully under-maintained. (The security problem
mentioned on https://
Spamass-milter or spamass-milt
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/) seems to be the de-facto
standard for using SpamAssassin as a milter for Sendmail or Postfix, but it is
woefully under-maintained. (The security problem mentioned on
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Integrate
17 matches
Mail list logo
