Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread jdow
On 20201017 10:58:13, RW wrote: On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400 Bill Cole wrote: On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote: perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 and versions <4 should have the original rules. The rule name change is an artifact of how the rule

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400 Bill Cole wrote: > On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote: > > > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 > > and versions <4 should have the original rules. > > The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are > version-c

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
That sums it up well for now, yes.  4.0 will even let you still use the same config options so there is a timeline for planning for the removal of the options with 4.1 whenever that is. On 10/17/2020 11:10 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Thanks a lot to all who replied. So, for the uninitiated like me

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread Victor Sudakov
Bill Cole wrote: > > > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 > > and versions <4 should have the original rules. > > The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are version-controlled. > We have exactly one version of the rules and it resides in the trunk of the

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Bill Cole
On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote: perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 and versions <4 should have the original rules. The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are version-controlled. We have exactly one version of the rules and it resides in

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Noel Butler
On 17/10/2020 00:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: My SpamAssassin reports that > > -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from' > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST > > However when I change "whiteli

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/16/2020 10:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 16.10.20 09:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> No, not until 4.0 is released.  Good question! > > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 > and versions <4 should have the original rules. The rule just happens to have

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: My SpamAssassin reports that -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from' -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST However when I change "whitelist_from" to "welcomelist_from", SpamAssassin complains: $ sp

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > My SpamAssassin reports that > > -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from' > > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WE

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:48:20 +0700 Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > My SpamAssassin reports that > > -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from' > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST > > > However when I change "whitelist_from" t

the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-16 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, My SpamAssassin reports that -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from' -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST However when I change "whitelist_fro