On 20201017 10:58:13, RW wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote:
perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4
and versions <4 should have the original rules.
The rule name change is an artifact of how the rule
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4
> > and versions <4 should have the original rules.
>
> The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are
> version-c
That sums it up well for now, yes. 4.0 will even let you still use the
same config options so there is a timeline for planning for the removal
of the options with 4.1 whenever that is.
On 10/17/2020 11:10 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Thanks a lot to all who replied. So, for the uninitiated like me
Bill Cole wrote:
>
> > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4
> > and versions <4 should have the original rules.
>
> The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are version-controlled.
> We have exactly one version of the rules and it resides in the trunk of the
On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote:
perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4
and versions <4 should have the original rules.
The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are
version-controlled. We have exactly one version of the rules and it
resides in
On 17/10/2020 00:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: My SpamAssassin reports that
>
> -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from'
> -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST
>
> However when I change "whiteli
On 10/16/2020 10:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 16.10.20 09:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> No, not until 4.0 is released. Good question!
>
> perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4
> and versions <4 should have the original rules.
The rule just happens to have
On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
My SpamAssassin reports that
-0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from'
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST
However when I change "whitelist_from" to "welcomelist_from", SpamAssassin
complains:
$ sp
On 10/16/2020 5:48 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> My SpamAssassin reports that
>
> -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from'
>
> -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WE
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 16:48:20 +0700
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> My SpamAssassin reports that
>
> -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from'
> -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST
>
>
> However when I change "whitelist_from" t
Dear Colleagues,
My SpamAssassin reports that
-0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELISTuser is listed in 'welcomelist_from'
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST
However when I change "whitelist_fro
11 matches
Mail list logo