--On Friday, October 08, 2021 2:04 PM +0200 Thomas Seilund
wrote:
When you say a rule hits do you then mean that the rule contribute to the
score? Can a rule hit and contribute with a value of zero to the score?
Setting a rule's score to zero (eg. in local.cf) disables the rule. This is
> Is it so that the list of rules only show rules that contribute to the
score?
Yes, only rules that contributed to the spam score are listed.
> What do you mean by a rule did not match?
SpamAssassin has hundreds/thousands of rules, each one looking at some
aspect of the email message. If the
On 10/8/21 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.10.21 um 11:18 schrieb Thomas Seilund:
Hi All
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming
mail then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for
all mails.
DNSWL is a whitelist for mailservers. So the tests based on that use the
IP that handed your trusted_networks the email.
Several tests are based on the transmitting server instead of just the
email contents, since contents can be convincing or not, if the server
is notorious for sending spam
On 10/8/21 11:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.10.21 11:18, Thomas Seilund wrote:
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming
mail then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for
all mails.
On 08.10.21 11:18, Thomas Seilund wrote:
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming mail
then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for all
mails.
Below are to examples:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0
Hi All
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming mail
then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for all mails.
Below are to examples:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=2.0
