>>> On 5/2/2018 at 2:57 PM, in message
<0e5889ab-b61a-36ba-6b28-549f2c365...@ena.com>, David Jones
wrote:
> On 05/02/2018 01:21 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
> someones day . . . )
>>
>> "Note: Failure to
On Wed, 2 May 2018, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
On 5/2/2018 at 2:57 PM, in message
<0e5889ab-b61a-36ba-6b28-549f2c365...@ena.com>, David Jones
wrote:
On 05/02/2018 01:21 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
someones
On Wed, 2 May 2018 15:32:50 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
[...]
> The first three terminations weren't good enough, so we're going to
> do it one more time. And if -that- one doesn't do it, we'll proceed
> to the final ultimate termination...
As in "I'm not dead
On 05/02/2018 01:21 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
someones day . . . )
"Note: Failure to Verify will lead to final termination of your email account.
Technical Team
Email Administrator
All Right Reversed 2018.(c)"
On Wed, 2 May 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 05/02/2018 01:21 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
someones day . . . )
"Note: Failure to Verify will lead to final termination of your email
account.
Technical Team
Email
On Wed, 2 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 05/02/2018 01:21 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
someones day . . . )
"Note: Failure to Verify will lead to final termination of your email
One slipped through, with this subtle sig line (thought it might brighten
someones day . . . )
"Note: Failure to Verify will lead to final termination of your email account.
Technical Team
Email Administrator
All Right Reversed 2018.(c)"
On Wed, 2 May 2018, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2018 15:32:50 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
[...]
The first three terminations weren't good enough, so we're going to
do it one more time. And if -that- one doesn't do it, we'll proceed
to the final
Kenneth Porter skrev den 2018-05-03 02:18:
I'm having very good results with this rule. I'm scoring it at 5 with
no false positives. The high negative score for a legitimate looking
List-id will file it into my List/Unknown folder for new lists and for
any spammers trying to abuse this, so it's
I'm having very good results with this rule. I'm scoring it at 5 with no
false positives. The high negative score for a legitimate looking List-id
will file it into my List/Unknown folder for new lists and for any spammers
trying to abuse this, so it's not a problem for my personal filtering.
10 matches
Mail list logo