Re: Rule for non-DKIM-signed messages

2019-05-13 Thread David Jones
On 5/12/19 9:29 PM, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > On 2019-05-11 23:25, David Jones wrote: > > I don't have anything nearly so elaborate.  But then I don't have the > spam volume either. > That's fine. Just wanted to point out that "one size doesn't fit all" for other readers on this list. The

Re: Rule for non-DKIM-signed messages

2019-05-13 Thread Brent Clark
Shot for sharing David !!! Regards Brent Clark P.s. I wonder what other tricks you have up your sleeve that you would be willing to share. :) On 2019/05/10 16:48, David Jones wrote: On 5/10/19 1:52 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote: Hi Kurt, On the contrary, most spam i see is valid DKIM

SpamAssassin Scoring For No SPF Record

2019-05-13 Thread Siddhesh
Hello Folks, Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have SPF record set ?? Regards, Siddhesh Kadam https://www.netcoresmartech.com/resources/ebooks/key-mobile-app-metrics?utm_source=email-disclaimer_medium=email_campaign=key-app-metrics

Re: SpamAssassin Scoring For No SPF Record

2019-05-13 Thread Bill Cole
On 14 May 2019, at 0:41, Siddhesh wrote: Hello Folks, Can we have a SpamAssassin score for a domain which doesn't have SPF record set ?? The rule SPF_NONE exists in the standard rules channel. It is currently scored at 0 by default. You are free to score it differently in your local