Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-08-16 12:05:43 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
And, quite reasonably, most rejections for spam include very little or no
detail, so aside from DNSBL-based rejections the sending platform has
essentially zero information beyond "the receiving system doesn't like us".
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 12:11 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Mmm. So how would you, as sender or sender's mail provider,
> troubleshoot a message rejected with "550 Too spammy"? I have seen
> several rejections that were equally clear and to the point, without
> divulging any particular detail
Hi,
starting on 08/16 a rule that is using captured tags has been promoted and
SpamAssassin 4.0 (this rule is disabled for SpamAssassin 3.x) started printing
log lines like:
Aug 16 01:07:49 spamd-intel1 spamd[1706586]: plugin: eval failed:
Timeout::_run: Unescaped left brace in regex is
