From: Simon Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
I have found that there are many rulesets available at
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour. Should I add ALL of them
in my TRUSTED_RULESETS or only need some of them will do the job?
YMMV is the operative term here.
YOU know how
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:11:12 -0800, you wrote:
I ran spamassassin -D and got the following in the debug output. Is this
a problem? If so what should I do?
[27299] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang-bayes_toks
[27299] dbg: bayes: not scoring message,
Should I add ALL of them
in my TRUSTED_RULESETS or only need some of them will do the job?
You definitely should NOT add ALL of the rulesets to your configuration!
Some of the rulesets are 2.6x only.
Some of them are 3.0.x only.
Some of them are 3.1 only.
At the very least you need to ONLY
On Sonntag, 12. Februar 2006 20:59 Jan Krumsiek wrote:
Is this really the same process with two threads?
Run pstree -p
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11
// PGP Key: lynx -source
Hello for all,
My SpamAssassin show me this messages somebody that means it ?
[10272] warn: Argument n.nn isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 251.
[10272] warn: Argument n.nn isn't numeric in addition (+) at
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Hello for all,
My SpamAssassin show me this messages somebody that means it ?
[10272] warn: Argument n.nn isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 251.
Generally that means you've got a configuration option
Can you help me to fix it ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2006 10:38
Para: Marcos Manhanes
Cc: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Assunto: Re:
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Hello for all,
My SpamAssassin
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Can you help me to fix it
Well, I can't help you without seeing the problem..
Also, I don't even know what version of SpamAssassin you are using. All
of my advice is assuming you are using SA 3.1.0.
You can start by finding all your score commands.
grep score
Don:
SpamC does not look at the to: address. I just solved this problem in a
thread earlier. Since I am using sendmail, I used the spamass-milter,
and that has the ability to look at the to address and send it directly
to spamd. If you want to have the userprefs loaded based on the to:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Also, I don't even know what version of SpamAssassin you are using. All
of my advice is assuming you are using SA 3.1.0.
Gotta be SA 3.1.0. 3.0 and trunk moves that code a bit.
You can start by finding all your score commands.
grep score
Have you tried to lint your rules?
---
Talk is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Manhanes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February
An FYI for those interested... I've updated the WebRedirect Plugin [1]
(for use with SpamAssassin 3.1) with changes I made around the end of
December to allow the testing of any HTTP status code.
The plugin now always includes a trailing slash (even when not present
in the parsed URI) when
Friends,
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 with Perl version 5.8.0.
It's a copy of the file Conf.pm
## Conf.pm #
245 # Set the actual scoreset values appropriately
246 for my $index (0..3) {
247 my $score = $relative ?
248
wrote:
Is anybody having any luck with the Stock spam that consists of an
image and noise to through off bayes?
Yeah. The new sare_stocks ruleset www.rulesemporium.org is pushing
most of them over the threshold, and Bayes seems to be taking care of
the rest. (In my experience, Bayes
Hmmm. upgraded to SA 3.1.0 and I get this when performing
a sa-learn:
Argument _POSTAL isn't numeric in addition (+)
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 251
Is this a problem? Is there a fix?
--
Tyler Nally
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Friends,
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 with Perl version 5.8.0.
It's a copy of the file Conf.pm
Ok, so it's DEFINITELY a score command.. So follow my advice with the grep
statements from the previous email I posted from my comcast.net account.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:11:16PM -0500, Tyler Nally wrote:
Argument _POSTAL isn't numeric in addition (+)
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 251
Is this a problem? Is there a fix?
You have a bad config line somewhere. probably something like
score RULE
I'm looking for a website to download new rules for Spamassassin 3.1.0
Ben
It information arrived to you ?
## Conf.pm #
245 # Set the actual scoreset values appropriately
246 for my $index (0..3) {
247 my $score = $relative ?
248 $self-{scoreset}-[$index]-{$rule} + $scores[$index] :
249
On Monday 13 February 2006 12:16 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:11:16PM -0500, Tyler Nally wrote:
Argument _POSTAL isn't numeric in addition (+)
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 251
Is this a problem? Is there a fix?
You have a bad
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
It information arrived to you ?
It did, twice.
Now do what Matt said and grep for n.nn in your config files, probably
in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Daryl
This is my file of the configuration
### local.cf ##
# Save spam messages as a message/rfc822 MIME attachment instead of
# modifying the original message (0: off, 2: use text/plain instead)
report_safe 1
# Set which networks or hosts
Good day!
My Spamassassin worked for years without skipping any emails. Suddenly
(and not coresponding to an upgrade) emails started showing up in my inbox
without spamassassin headers.
I call spamc via procmail. Spamassassin is v3.1.0, and I run spamd like
this:
/usr/bin/spamd -d
Jason Marshall wrote:
Good day!
My Spamassassin worked for years without skipping any emails. Suddenly
(and not coresponding to an upgrade) emails started showing up in my
inbox without spamassassin headers.
How big are the messages that aren't getting scanned?
Over 250k?
I call spamc
When I made it command not show nothing.
But I think that some times ago I got some rules and when I made
upgrade to new version it stop to worked.
Did you see it's rules ?
20_porn.cf
bogus-virus-warnings.cf
chickenpox.cf
evilrules.cf local.cf-new
antidrug.cf br_rules.cf
DomainDigits1.cf
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
It information arrived to you ?
I don't need your conf.pm. That just proves my assumption about your version was
correct.
I need your score statements from your config files.
I need the output of these two commands:
grep score /etc/mail/spamassassin/*
grep score
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
When I made it command not show nothing.
But I think that some times ago I got some rules and when I made
upgrade to new version it stop to worked.
Did you see it's rules ?
20_porn.cf
bogus-virus-warnings.cf
chickenpox.cf
evilrules.cf local.cf-new
DAve wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or
razor? Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to
either?
I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely
I am not sure if there is anything that I can do ...
But our marketing email address is getting spammed to death. We are
getting about 2000 messages an hour. It is getting to be a problem.
Do any of you have a suggestion other than simply turfing the email
address ?
Thanks
Peter
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Actually, to be more specific, you need to find a score statement which
literally has n.nn in it instead of an actual score.
I'd venture to guess someone copy-pasted *directly* out of the manpage.
grep score /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf |grep n\.nn
grep score
I had this problem a couple years back with our education email address. While
the account got moderate levels of spam, it was absolutely inundated with virus
backscatter. After a few months of trying to block the majority of it, we
deemed the effort futile and abandoned the address. It was a
Are the messages coming from the same sending server? If so, I'd
blacklist it at your MTA until the storm is over.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:16 PM
To: SpamAssassin list
Subject: User getting spammed to
nope .. unfortunitly, that is not the case :(
Kristopher Austin wrote:
Are the messages coming from the same sending server? If so, I'd
blacklist it at your MTA until the storm is over.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February
Peter:
I know this is probably not the problem... but you might want to be extra
sure that this is not really a case of the SAME small group of messages
downloading over and over again.
I've seen that happen before where Outlook or Outlook Express, when
downloading 20 messages off of the server
Thanks for the advice, it's well suited. FYI, my average scan time is:
7.73104733769435
I have enabled pyzor, razor and dcc. All looks fine for now. Of course
this is a work in progress and I will have to keep a close eye on it.
Ed
---
Talk
please send unsubscribe address. I cannot find it on the spamassissin
site.
Thanks
Mike
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or
razor? Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to
either?
I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely
That may be an important catch, Jim. Are there any indications you are
going into swapping?
No, I'm quite certain that is not an issue since it has now been moved onto
a new server and uses around 1% of the real memory but still has the errors.
And what command string is spamd spawned? That
Michael Di Martino wrote:
please send unsubscribe address. I cannot find it on the spamassissin
site.
That's because it's in the headers of *EVERY* message on the list. Note that
this is the RFC standardized method for telling users how to unsubscribe, so be
sure to check for it on other
Henry F. Camacho Jr a écrit :
Matt:
Hmmm... Matt, this is exactly what init is designed to do, it will
respawn any daemon that stops running, and reruns it automatically.
Some people use something called daemon tools, or something called
supervisor, all which work just fine. I think init
On Mon, February 13, 2006 11:20 am, Michael Di Martino wrote:
please send unsubscribe address. I cannot find it on the spamassissin
site.
In the headers of every message:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, February 13, 2006 11:59 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
That's because it's in the headers of *EVERY* message on the list. Note
that
this is the RFC standardized method for telling users how to unsubscribe,
so be
sure to check for it on other lists you subscribe to.
SNIP
list-unsubscribe:
Using some good RBLs at your MTA should help, also make sure you are running
current version of SA with everything enabled (bayes, urbl, etc)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:16 PM
To: SpamAssassin list
Subject:
Using some good RBLs at your MTA should help, also make sure you are running
current version of SA with everything enabled (bayes, urbl, etc)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:16 PM
To: SpamAssassin list
Subject:
Evan Platt wrote:
On Mon, February 13, 2006 11:59 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
That's because it's in the headers of *EVERY* message on the list. Note
that
this is the RFC standardized method for telling users how to unsubscribe,
so be
sure to check for it on other lists you subscribe to.
Greg Allen wrote:
Using some good RBLs at your MTA should help, also make sure you are running
current version of SA with everything enabled (bayes, urbl, etc)
True, spamcop and some other RBLs have recently started blacklisting sites that
emit backwash.
On 2/13/2006 7:16 PM +0100, Peter Marshall wrote:
I am not sure if there is anything that I can do ...
But our marketing email address is getting spammed to death. We are
getting about 2000 messages an hour. It is getting to be a problem.
Do any of you have a suggestion other than simply
I downloaded some of the rules that they had. Just seeing what the
affect is for the next few days. Thanks of the help
Ben
On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Chris Stone wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:18:05PM -0500, Benjamin Adams wrote:
I'm looking for a website to download new rules for
I am not sure if there is anything that I can do ...
But our marketing email address is getting spammed to death. We are
getting about 2000 messages an hour. It is getting to be a problem.
Do any of you have a suggestion other than simply turfing the email
address ?
Thanks
Peter
On Mon, February 13, 2006 2:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just started to reject mails where the sender does not care to put
my email addy into
To or Cc field,
Wow.. So if someone sends a message where you're on the BCC, you simply
delete it?
I get a number of e-mails from friends
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason Marshall wrote:
Good day!
My Spamassassin worked for years without skipping any emails. Suddenly
(and not coresponding to an upgrade) emails started showing up in my
inbox without spamassassin headers.
How big are the messages that aren't getting
How big are the messages that aren't getting scanned?
Over 250k?
Random sizes, most far smaller than 250k.
And do you have per user rules enabled? If so do any of the user
rules have a rawbody or full rule attribute?
I do; each user has a .spamassassin/user_prefs file. Most of them are
Jason Marshall wrote:
I just noticed that I get spamd[797]: prefork: child states:
quite often in the logs. This doesn't look bad to me, but I don't
know what is supposed to mean... Probably nothing.
That means 4 children exist, and they are all idle. That's a good thing :)
From: Jason Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How big are the messages that aren't getting scanned?
Over 250k?
Random sizes, most far smaller than 250k.
And do you have per user rules enabled? If so do any of the user
rules have a rawbody or full rule attribute?
I do; each user has a
Anyone else seeing this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# wget
http://apache.roweboat.net/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0.tar.gz
--21:47:02--
http://apache.roweboat.net/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0.tar.gz
= `Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0.tar.gz'
Resolving
If it was in $USER/.spamassassin/user_prefs it's very good. There is a
Yep, the rawbody rule was in my user_prefs.
workaround if you are using procmail. (If SA does not put headers into
the message run it again. I run it as spamassassin rather than the
daemon to be sure. I've seen VERY VERY
jdow wrote:
I've whined. It SEEMS to trace to a perl bug. In fact it seems to be
related to a perl interaction between threads which should be impossible.
...and I've long ago sent you a patch to help debug it. :p
Hi Evan,
it is currently an addition to qmail-scanner
As for whielisting: if the envelope from matches @spamassassin.apache.org or
@lists.sourceforge.net
or my username (yes, I sometimes bcc me a copy) let it through.
Otherwise if none of my possible names appears in either to or cc, it must
58 matches
Mail list logo
