http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:37:29 + (UTC), martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just wonder, how can make sa-learn/spamassassin to unlearn a message? thx
jdow jdow at
Nigel Frankcom nigel at blue-canoe.net writes:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:37:29 + (UTC), martin
martinnitram at excite.com wrote:
just wonder, how can make
1) Hammer it over the head with sa-learn OTHER_OPTIONS --forget message.
2) Feed the message mis-handled as spam to sa-learn --ham and vice versa.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
just wonder, how can make sa-learn/spamassassin to unlearn a message? thx
As far as I know the forget option removes any tokens added to bayes
for that message regardless of whether it was trained in as ham or
spam. If you added it as spam by mistake then you would re-add it as
ham and vice versa (after running forget).
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:08:06 + (UTC), martin
Hello,
I found this syslog entry a few times recently:
Jul 16 23:02:25 mond spamd[4500]: Minute '60' out of range 0..59 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 429
What does this mean?
Using SA 3.1.1 on Debian Linux 3.1.
--
Yves Goergen LonelyPixel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Yves Goergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I found this syslog entry a few times recently:
Jul 16 23:02:25 mond spamd[4500]: Minute '60' out of range 0..59 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 429
What does this mean?
That means that the 60 is not within the range
On 7/19/2006 4:45 AM, Yves Goergen wrote:
Hello,
I found this syslog entry a few times recently:
Jul 16 23:02:25 mond spamd[4500]: Minute '60' out of range 0..59 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 429
Fairly harmless. If they bother you there's a patch here:
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:04 -0300, Claudia Burman wrote:
I've googled and I searched the list archives but I can't find
information on this.
How do you use the whitelist subject and the blacklist subject plugin?
Where do yo write the blacklist or the whitelist?
Thanks
Claudia Burman
El
On 7/18/06, Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previous message aside, either the user name is wrong or the db for
that user is empty
I guess you are thinking about this line from my maillog:
Jul 18 19:28:20 BlackPete spamd[24325]: bayes: not available for
scanning, only 1 spam(s) in
Hi list: Like it says on the subject... how can i achieve that...?? cause i'm afraid of deleting them directlyi read the faq, but sincerely i didn't understand how to do it...Many thanks.Facundo.
Thank you for the link to the article.It was very helpful. I think i
understand what is going on. It is only putting username in the database
without the [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using squirellmail saspam plugin to let
users adjust their own settings. They just login with username into
squirellmail
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 15:57 +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:04 -0300, Claudia Burman wrote:
I've googled and I searched the list archives but I can't find
information on this.
How do you use the whitelist subject and the blacklist subject plugin?
Where do yo write the
John Horne wrote:
[SNIP]
Hello,
I'm guessing here that this is an SA 3.1 thing (subject whitelisting)?
We are running 3.0.6.
My question though is does whitelisting something cause SA to abort
trying the other tests?
That (aborting other tests) is called short-circuiting and doesn't exist
Hi Facundo.
That depends on what software you are using. If you are using procmail you
can add something like this to your procmail.rc:
:0:
#* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
[EMAIL
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
...
If I was in your position, I'd try to switch over to a system like Maia
Mailguard that keeps a copy of each mail in a database and users can
confirm and/or correct the underlying SpamAssassin engine's decisions.
This system uses a singel bayes
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:53:49AM -0500, Robert Nicholson wrote:
secondly I see in the SA code that in order to get one per array
element you have to use split /^/ the documentation for
get_pristine_header doesn't appear to be correct.
Sure it does.
-
Returns pristine headers of the
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
did you investigate auto-learning? This might let your system learn ham
as well as spam. Works fine here (same situation - gateway server to a
Lotus Notes system, no feedback loop possible)
May be I should change the threshholds for autolearning
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html#anchor
It appears that SA treats the # as the start
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
It appears that SA treats the # as the start of a comment and leaves
#anchor out of the resulting report. Is there a way to escape the #?
Try a single backslash:
.../blahblahblah\#anchor
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html#anchor
It
Please excuse my last post. After doing some more testing, I found that I
actually need a way for procmail to do the spamc -u options. Anyone have any
suggestions on how I might accomplish this? I am using sendmail with
procmail.
Again, thank you for all of your assistance
Allen
--
View this
Hi,
At around 1p yesterday all of a sudden I started to see some
messages out of the ordinary. I've tracked it down to happening around
the same time SA is running.
I syslog everything to /var/log/spool, and if I do :
egrep 'clean |nologin' /var/log/spool | grep -v kernel
I
May be I should change the threshholds for autolearning
different from the default? (I never touched them so far).
Yes. Set it to -0.1. If you have been doing a lot of autolearning without
this you may have a moderately sick bayes db, and might want to consider
starting over.
Just read up at http://www.maiamailguard.com/, but: yes, each and every
mail is stored in a database.
Ham/Non-virus-mails get delivered at once though, only a copy is getting
stored in the db
Dirk
Chr. v. Stuckrad schrieb:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
...
If I was in your
Hi all,
Loren Wilton wrote:
May be I should change the threshholds for autolearning
different from the default? (I never touched them so far).
Yes. Set it to -0.1. If you have been doing a lot of autolearning
without this you may have a moderately sick bayes db, and might want to
-Original Message-
From: spamassassinuser19 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 08:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: SA 3.1.1 and sql user prefs
Thank you for the link to the article.It was very helpful. I
think i understand what is going
From: Facundo Barrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list:
Like it says on the subject... how can i achieve that...?? cause i'm
afraid of deleting them directly
i read the faq, but sincerely i didn't understand how to do it...
Assuredly you cannot do this with SpamAssassin. You have to go up
From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
At around 1p yesterday all of a sudden I started to see some
messages out of the ordinary. I've tracked it down to happening around
the same time SA is running.
I syslog everything to /var/log/spool, and if I do :
egrep 'clean |nologin'
Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local
anchors
report For more info, see
What are the steps to whitelist email sent from (i.e. Postmaster
when bouncing mail) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
-Philip
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Paul Dudley wrote:
If we decide to reject low grade spam messages rather than
quarantine them, is it possible to add text to the body of the
rejection message?
Rejecting (bouncing) spam is utterly pointless, as 99% of it will
From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
At around 1p yesterday all of a sudden I started to see some
messages out of the ordinary. I've tracked it down to happening around
the same time SA is running.
I syslog everything to /var/log/spool, and if I do :
egrep 'clean
From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recognize that you likely have two different problems.
The clean simply means spamd correctly processed a message that was not
spam.
Right, I know. I was trying to point out that every time I had a
clean message, I had one of those attempts...
Hello.
Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with
Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the
same effect?
Thank you.
--
Jose Celestino | http://xpto.org/~japc/files/japc-pgpkey.asc
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:37:10AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote:
Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with
Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the
same effect?
Yes and no.
...
Ok, so first, stop-at-threshold was removed *AGES* ago, 2.50
Words by Theo Van Dinter [Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:49:35PM -0400]:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:37:10AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote:
Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with
Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the
same effect?
Yes and
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:04:57AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote:
and throws a warning. So, the short short version about why it went away
(you
can search the archives/bugzilla if you want) is that it didn't work right,
and potentially made things slower.
Searched for it, even on the
37 matches
Mail list logo
