the my spamassassin rule is as follow:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mx2.freebsd.org
and here is the recieved header with spamassassin:
Received: by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix, from userid 59)
id 66A1D3ECD; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:00:05 +0900 (KST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
You can go back to using ipv4 or use another whitelist method such as
whitelist_from_spf/dkim/dk/auth. Although unless you've got
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
You can go back to using ipv4 or use another whitelist method
I have recently starting seeing spams with URLS contining googlepages
websites
Currently I am scoring all googlepages.com link mails with 1.5 :-(
How do you folks trap these mails , And how do we report abuse to google
( if they really bother )
Thanks
Ram
Matt Kettler wrote:
As an alternative, you can use whitelist_from_spf or
whitelist_from_rcvd on the list's return-path. From there, you can
configure shortcircuiting to bypass the rest of SA and bayes_ignore_from
to prevent learning.
Would this be OK
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL
K Anand wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
As an alternative, you can use whitelist_from_spf or
whitelist_from_rcvd on the list's return-path. From there, you can
configure shortcircuiting to bypass the rest of SA and bayes_ignore_from
to prevent learning.
Would this be OK
whitelist_from_rcvd
ah.. sorry.. the subject was wrong..
ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from === ipv6 and whitelist_from_rcvd
respect,
bh
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:27 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
as you can see above, there
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 14:58 +0530, K Anand wrote:
K Anand wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
As an alternative, you can use whitelist_from_spf or
whitelist_from_rcvd on the list's return-path. From there, you can
configure shortcircuiting to bypass the rest of SA and bayes_ignore_from
hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
Hi
I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 and
amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 and have added few rules, and one to test it in my
local.cf:
[...]
well, imho, its using is not fair to over the world. because
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 14:58 +0530, K Anand wrote:
K Anand wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
As an alternative, you can use whitelist_from_spf or
whitelist_from_rcvd on the list's return-path. From there, you can
configure shortcircuiting to bypass the rest of SA and
-Original Message-
From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:33 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: googlepages.com abuse
I have recently starting seeing spams with URLS containing
Google pages websites
Currently I am scoring all
On 12.11.07 18:13, Wolfgang Uhr wrote:
I've a small problem. We have installed courier mta on our server and we
start sa using the command
xfilter /usr/bin/spamassassin
resp.
xfilter /usr/bin/spamc
where do you run that from? The procmailrc/mailfilter?
If we do this the folder
On 12.11.07 11:27, Kim Hurlbutt wrote: Wondering if you can point me in the
right direction on how to make our spam scores lower. How can I get
information on how to make edits to our pages to lower our scores? We
currently use Kintera to send our email newsletters. Please help!!
Score
On 13.11.07 15:52, K Anand wrote:
This is what I get
[...]
I think the problem has something to do with this line :
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
configure your smtp server to add DNS data to Received: line.
*list_from_rcvd doesn't work without list
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
Hi
I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 and
amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 and have added few rules, and one to test it in my
local.cf:
[...]
well, imho, its using is
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
Hi
I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3
and
amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 and have added few rules, and one to test it in my
local.cf:
[...]
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 08:04 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
Hi
I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3
and
amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 and have added few rules, and
SpankTheSpam wrote:
But the plugins are working now, it seems that it needs amavisd
restart to get new plugins, even if amavisd is calling spamassassin
each time the message comes in.
Amavisd does not call SpamAssassin for each message. Amavisd
initializes the SpamAssassin libraries when it
Well, I recently called my Senator to ask him to support enhanced
network neutrality legislation (since he worked on the 1998
Telecommunications Bill).
I received his reply 2 days later by email. Ok. I found that there
were some misconceptions he had about the topic on a purely technical
At 02:22 PM 11/13/2007, Philip Prindeville wrote:
So I'm wondering... if they send emails out that can't be replied to...
doesn't that correspond to the very definition of a
spammer? Aren't they concealing their identity?
Sigh.
I just had one of those from my bank. I asked a question,
As a heads up, more people will read your message if you make your
Subject line more insightful.
Ironically, I contacted Kintera last Spring pointing out that I wasn't
getting messages from one of their customers because they were sending
malformed messages that pegged the spam-o-meter (in
On Nov 13, 2007 3:32 AM, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you folks trap these mails , And how do we report
abuse to google ( if they really bother )
You can't. Google ignores complaints, and email to @googlepages.com
will bounce in 5 days due to their refusal to even
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.11.07 15:52, K Anand wrote:
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
configure your smtp server to add DNS data to Received: line.
*list_from_rcvd doesn't work without list
(although it could be worth adding IP or CIDR check in such
At 19:31 13-11-2007, Bart Schaefer wrote:
Er, which RFC are you claiming requires them to have a server to receive mail?
It's a BCP quoted by SMTP folks to annoy Web-enabled people. :-)
Regards,
-sm
hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:43 +0530, K Anand wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.11.07 15:52, K Anand wrote:
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
configure your smtp server to add DNS data to Received: line.
*list_from_rcvd doesn't work without list
25 matches
Mail list logo
