Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

2009-11-29 Thread Jonas Eckerman
Martijn Grooten wrote: - I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free; This doesn't make any sense. You are comparing SA to commercial

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

2009-11-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On søn 29 nov 2009 12:59:32 CET, Jonas Eckerman wrote I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA install) would pay to use the better DNSBLs. ask recipient if a isp does a well good job of stopping spam to ones inbox, payed dnsbl or not :=) shared rbl listes is silly,

X_Report_Header

2009-11-29 Thread Daniel D Jones
Running 3.2.5 under Debian Etch. I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1) ... If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by adding

Re: X_Report_Header

2009-11-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Daniel D Jones wrote: Running 3.2.5 under Debian Etch. I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1) ... If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is