pclnz wrote:
Wonder if anyone can help with a rule to combat thousands of spam I am
receiving in our mail server every day
I have tried to work out a .cf rule, but no luck so I am having to add
series a new rules every day
The spams have subject line like the below
Best prices for
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico rm...@lexiconn.com wrote:
Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're
seeing these errors in the logs:
spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line 195, GEN22 line 54.
Robert Mangiafico wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Robert Mangiafico
rm...@lexiconn.com wrote:
Is SA 3.3.1 no longer compatible with POPAuth? After upgrading, we're
seeing these errors in the logs:
spamd[29369]: Pseudo-hashes are deprecated at
/etc/mail/spamassassin/POPAuth.pm line
Hi everybody,
I'd like to introduce our first release of a SpamAssassin adaption,
SpamAssassin for Windows by JAM Software. It’s completely free of charge.
It's based on the latest SA release 3.3.1 and comes with ActiveState's
Community Edition of their runtime ActivePerl.
Because of some
Best prices for friends. You save 77%. migration married t the f
Good news, keith. This week we sell at -78%. Ewopyze
For info: Everything at -79%. show poor on
News for peter - popular brands 79% cheaper
For user peter: get -75% to all prices.
WholeSale craig! Buy at -82% today.
These
I agree that full smaples are needed.
The % Subject alone is not enough.
But I would expect there is something 'common' to the body
that would combine in a meta rule for decent score with minimal fp...
So throw some examples up on pastebin.
- C
How do apply an SA patch,
Running SA on FreeeBSD
thx
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 136
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: jnat...@familycareintl.org
How do apply an SA patch,
srsly?
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
You're a network administrator? On Broadway?
omg.
At least TRY to provide some information that might be helpful for us
to direct you.
If I were a spammer, I'd
I setup this box YEARS ago, and only updated the versions of sa exim and
clamav, (this only filters my mail before it hands it off to my exchange server.
But lately its been timing out a lot, and I read there's a patch to address
this issue
Freebsd exim clam and sa sw config 3.3
On tir 18 maj 2010 18:44:44 CEST, Jean-Paul Natola wrote
Freebsd exim clam and sa sw config 3.3
complains goes to the freebsd maintainer(s) not to spamassassin support lists
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Why don´t you update it via FreeBSD ports? The latest version is there...
Quoting Jean-Paul Natola jnat...@familycareintl.org:
I setup this box YEARS ago, and only updated the versions of sa
exim and clamav, (this only filters my mail before it hands it off
to my exchange server.
But
--On Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:59 AM -0400 Charles Gregory
cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
I agree that full smaples are needed.
The % Subject alone is not enough.
But I would expect there is something 'common' to the body
that would combine in a meta rule for decent score with minimal fp...
So throw
On 5/18/10 12:44 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I setup this box YEARS ago, and only updated the versions of sa exim and
clamav, (this only filters my mail before it hands it off to my exchange server.
But lately its been timing out a lot, and I read there's a patch to address
this issue
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Kenneth Porter wrote:
So throw some examples up on pastebin.
Here's some:
http://sewingwitch.com/ken/Stuff/foo.txt
I'm currently catching them with this:
header KP_PERCENT Subject =~ /\b-?[78][0-9]%/
describe KP_PERCENT 70-89 percent in subject
How do apply an SA patch,
Running SA on FreeeBSD
thx
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 136
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: jnat...@familycareintl.org
Before you patch any
probably not intentional, but with all the copies of the
SpamAssassin::CONF files all over the world (and the silly spammers
harvesting anything with @ in it)
The poor folks at http://www.ress.com must be wondering why they keep
getting emails for 'add'
Thanks so much - worked excellently
Thanks to all who answered
Cheers
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:sh...@sewingwitch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2010 7:00 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: percentage off spam
--On Tuesday, May 18, 2010
On Tuesday May 18 2010 23:24:41 Michael Scheidell wrote:
probably not intentional, but with all the copies of the
SpamAssassin::CONF files all over the world (and the silly spammers
harvesting anything with @ in it)
The poor folks at http://www.ress.com must be wondering why they keep
I was checking some links today using Whois in a email message and
found this one:
emailfriendz.com
Note the Technical Contact name and his email address. At least he is honest.
Frank
On Tuesday 18 May 2010, fchan wrote:
Note the Technical Contact name and his email address.
Oh, great, now I'm imagining lasagna made with SPAM.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications, www.speed.net
On Tue, 18 May 2010, fchan wrote:
I was checking some links today using Whois in a email message and
found this one:
emailfriendz.com
Note the Technical Contact name and his email address. At least he is
honest.
Frank
Yes but look at his Name Servers record, there's the real truth,
not
And, of course, neither name server can be found.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: David B Funk dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/May/18 16:07
Subject: Re: Interesting email link in spam
On Tue, 18 May 2010, fchan wrote:
I was
I posted a message to the list showing how the spam containing % in the
subject scored on my system. A bit later checking my failed messages
folder I saw this:
This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
23 matches
Mail list logo
