* Daniel McDonald dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com:
I just need to clarify one thing that's not clear to me in re-reading
our thread from the other day: Is there a work-around for this?
Usually, you listen for end-users on the submission port, and don't filter
it for spam, just auth.
I
On 07/07/10 23:26, Greg Troxel wrote:
Louis Guillaume lo...@zabrico.com writes:
I just need to clarify one thing that's not clear to me in re-reading
our thread from the other day: Is there a work-around for this?
My users are getting restless. Everytime their ISP changes their IP
address
I've upgraded from 3.2.1 to 3.2.5 on gentoo. It appears that dcc is
broken. My messages no longer get the dcc header:
First, did you know that 3.3.1 was released? Otherwise, why stop at 3.2.5?
On 04.07.10 07:24, Robert S wrote:
3.3.1 is still marked as unstable by gentoo. I've
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:19:43 +0100
Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
so they have no SPF policy? Wrong, they do, but it's on their
email.barclays.co.uk subdomain as presumably that's the domain they
send mail from - but how are you supposed to know that if they don't
tell you?
On
Cedric Knight ced...@gn.apc.org writes:
On 07/07/10 23:26, Greg Troxel wrote:
Louis Guillaume lo...@zabrico.com writes:
I just need to clarify one thing that's not clear to me in re-reading
our thread from the other day: Is there a work-around for this?
My users are getting restless.
I've upgraded from 3.2.1 to 3.2.5 on gentoo. It appears that dcc is
broken. My messages no longer get the dcc header:
First, did you know that 3.3.1 was released? Otherwise, why stop at 3.2.5?
On 04.07.10 07:24, Robert S wrote:
3.3.1 is still marked as unstable by gentoo. I've
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Louis Guillaume wrote:
(spamass-milter doesn't tell SA about auth) == [
rbl checks run against authenticated user's IP address
lack of ALL_TRUSTED for authenticated user's mail
That last one seems to be my problem. Does the patch fix this?
(spamass-milter doesn't tell SA about auth) == [
rbl checks run against authenticated user's IP address
lack of ALL_TRUSTED for authenticated user's mail
That last one seems to be my problem. Does the patch fix this? I'll
try updating and see what happens.
2010-07-08 09:05:01 1OWqmi-0005N3-JU /*SA: Action: flagged as Spam but
accepted: score=4.0 required=4.0 */(scanned in 0/0 secs | Message-Id:
20100708130436.52c7d1cb1...@mail.microton.com.br). From
care...@habitat.com (host=NULL [189.26.124.122]) for a...@plexicomm.net
The above is a line from
On 7/8/2010 10:52 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
2010-07-08 09:05:01 1OWqmi-0005N3-JU /*SA: Action: flagged as Spam but
accepted: score=4.0 required=4.0 */(scanned in 0/0 secs | Message-Id:
20100708130436.52c7d1cb1...@mail.microton.com.br). From
care...@habitat.com (host=NULL [189.26.124.122]) for
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
offertereg...@dominio.it - m.altam...@mydomain.com, Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001,
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
offertereg...@dominio.it - m.altam...@mydomain.com, Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
well, this has completely nothing to do with spamassassin.
it's amavis or tyour MTA's issue. Spamassassin is only responsible for
checking if the mail is spam, and here amavis plugs between SA and MTA
only
to call some spamassassin functions.
therefore I must
On 08/07/10 16:44, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
offertereg...@dominio.it - m.altam...@mydomain.com, Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163,
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
or check http://www.artica.fr that include spamassassin+amavis+end-user mgmt
On 08/07/2010 23:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
16 matches
Mail list logo
