Just ran across this:
someone hacked sourceforge over the weekend. anyone downloading any
opensource software should doublecheck.
(and hopefully, you had sha256 checksums or pgp signatures and checked
them when you do download opensource software)
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
The battle raged for a while, but eventually we were delisted.
(We block mail from to postmas...@roaringpenguin.com because we never,
ever send mail from postmas...@roaringpenguin.com)
We do the same for postmas...@columbia.edu for the same
RFC Ignorant is deep into kook territory, as should be apparent if you
look at which RFCs they expect people to follow, and what their
definition of follow is.
abuse.net has been listed for years, since there is an autoresponder
on ab...@abuse.net, and I've never noticed any delivery problems.
Hello Danita Zanre,
Am 2011-02-01 07:30:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Messages from this list have been bouncing since I started enforcing
Reverse DNS lookups on my server.
Thats interesting, because my Courier-MTA does it to and it does not
bounce a singel message from this list
Hello Giles Coochey,
Am 2011-02-01 15:46:05, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Personally, rejecting a message on the basis of a single criteria is
pretty harsh. You don't need to be the RFC-police to catch nearly
all spam and I'm sure that rejecting on a single issue or dubious
fact will
Hello David F. Skoll,
Am 2011-02-01 10:02:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
The battle raged for a while, but eventually we were delisted.
(We block mail from to postmas...@roaringpenguin.com because we never,
ever send mail from postmas...@roaringpenguin.com)
Hmmm, if you could know,
