Hi again,
I checked the rule now by inserting a line like
ASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16
in the test-msg, modified the asn-rule to
header TEST_AS3701 ASN =~ /^AS3701 /
describe TEST_AS3701Sender IP in AS from friendly SA user
score TEST_AS3701 -0.1
tested, and ...
X-Spam-Status:
I ran some tests which indicate one may not have subsequent '-' after
'X-' in header lines:
given this message:
X-SpamASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16
X-Spam-ASN: AS3701 140.211.0.0/16
body...
and those rules:
header _LOCAL_XAS1 X-SpamASN =~ /AS3701 /
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
I ran some tests which indicate one may not have subsequent '-' after
'X-' in header lines:
Thats a great test, many thnx for it.
It simply indicates, that ASN.pm is running nearly at first, before
SA does its messurements.
And SA surely strips all head-lines
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote:
And SA surely strips all head-lines starting with X-Spam- before
its doing anything.
In Mail/SpamAssassin.pm there is some special handling of
X-Spam- prefixed mail headers.
So it's really not about subsequent dashes.
--
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote:
And SA surely strips all head-lines starting with X-Spam- before
its doing anything.
In Mail/SpamAssassin.pm there is some special handling of
X-Spam- prefixed mail headers.
So it's really not about
On 24.04.13 17:01, psychobyte wrote:
in the bayes case, the table is bayes_token and indeed
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL is INSERTING into the table via
_put_tokens().
my $insertsql = INSERT INTO bayes_token
(id, token, spam_count, ham_count, atime)
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:45:42 +0200
Frank Gadegast wrote:
Hi all,
I like to set extra score on mail coming from some ASns
using the asn.pm
Lets say I like to reject all mail from BELPAK.BY I wrote
header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 /
describe LOCAL_AS6697 Sender IP in
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
I don't think so... IIRC the REPLACE INTO deletes existing record and
inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues for me
some ~10 years ago, so i switched to the update or insert.
REPLACE
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
I don't think so... IIRC the REPLACE INTO deletes existing record and
inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues for me
some ~10 years ago, so i switched to the update or insert.
On 25.04.13
On 4/25/2013 11:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
I don't think so... IIRC the REPLACE INTO deletes existing record and
inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues
for me
some ~10
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock blaso...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as
soon as sombody
So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net wrote:
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock blaso...@gmail.com het
volgende
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock
Recently there was a good thread about postscreen and rbl. I just updated my
config and have seen a decent improvement.
Here is the starter message:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-04/0468.html
Hope this helps,
Tony
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase the
question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there are
usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra, are there
any?
On 26 Apr 2013 01:00, Tony Nelson tnel...@starpoint.com wrote:
Recently
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote:
And SA is doing it right, to remove all X-Spam-lines
before its starting, so that spammer cannot trick SA.
And whatever line is inserted by ASN.pm, it needs
to be stripped too, and thats why its programmed
like it is.
But I have no still no idea how
On 4/25/2013 11:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...
My understanding is that it's better (with respect to performance and
atomicity) to attempt the INSERT and have it fail than to check if the
ID/token combination already exists and UPDATE it if it does.
Please note that it would
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra,
are there any?
Color me
--On Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:19 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann
guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
are
Hi, Martin -
Thank you for your response.
I like your point about the portmanteau rules (and I award you two Points
for using one of my favorite words in a new - yet appropriate - manner!).
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really low
then tying them all
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really low
then tying them all together with meta-rules.
Best practice is to define them as __SUBRULES, which don't score at all,
and then tie those together in metas.
The only reason
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 13:57 +0100, RW wrote:
I was just looking at the ASM plugin and it defines tags, but not a
metadata pseudo-header. With other plugins, header tests run against
that metadata header.
Doh! Spot on.
The metadata pseudo-headers are missing. Header rules can match against
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 18:45 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I like your point about the portmanteau rules (and I award you two
Points for using one of my favorite words in a new - yet appropriate -
manner!).
:-)
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really
low then
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:03:30 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 13:57 +0100, RW wrote:
I was just looking at the ASM plugin and it defines tags, but not a
metadata pseudo-header. With other plugins, header tests run
against that metadata header.
Doh! Spot on.
The
25 matches
Mail list logo
