Hi,
I have been using __MANY_RECIPS in some meta rules for some time now,
and noticed a weird FP today. The rule seems to count the number of '@'s
in the To and CC header. Someone sent a mail to using the (albeit silly)
format, probably by using reply-to-all in a braindead MUA:
To The foo
b Trying to figure out why RP_MATCHES_RCVD scored so low. Is it
because Return-Path: se...@c001n01.zahost.ru and the last
Received matches that domain? if so, anything I can do to score t as
the proper spam it is?
Original Message
Return-Path: se...@c001n01.zahost.ru
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
b Trying to figure out why RP_MATCHES_RCVD scored so low. Is it
because Return-Path: se...@c001n01.zahost.ru and the last
Received matches that domain? if so, anything I can do to score t as
the proper spam it is?
RP_MATCHES_RCVD is a check
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
b Trying to figure out why RP_MATCHES_RCVD scored so low. Is it
because Return-Path: se...@c001n01.zahost.ru and the last
Received matches that domain? if so, anything I can do to score t as
the proper spam it is?
On 21.10.13 10:24, John Hardin
On Oct 19, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:34 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'm trying to write a rule that gives some spamminess score to messages
received from any host that resolves to protection.outlook.com.
I tried to use
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 13:19 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Oct 19, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de
wrote:
RULE_NAME X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ rdns=evil.example.net /
That rdns value is added to the Received header by your SMTP, and your
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 14:11 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
I have been using __MANY_RECIPS in some meta rules for some time now,
and noticed a weird FP today. The rule seems to count the number of '@'s
in the To and CC header. Someone sent a mail to using the (albeit silly)
format, probably by
