Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

On 2016-08-01 05:55, @lbutlr wrote: On 31 Jul 2016, at 01:06, Robert Schetterer wrote: But thats historic, bots are recoded, better antibot tecs were invented. The only problem now is people still believe in historic stuff. Yeah, that about sums it up. Greylisting never worked

Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

On 31 Jul 2016, at 01:06, Robert Schetterer wrote: > But thats historic, bots are recoded, better antibot tecs were invented. > The only problem now is people still believe in historic stuff. Yeah, that about sums it up. Greylisting never worked well, always caused problems with

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 13:27, Benny Pedersen wrote: # rule:[h.reindl maillist] if allof (header :contains "from" "h.rei...@thelounge.net", header :contains "to" "users@spamassassin.apache.org") { setflag "\\Seen"; stop; } That seems poorly written as it relies upon the To field while the

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 22:23, Reindl Harald wrote: what the hell is the reason to spam this list with a report of a FP solved years ago *before* update your stuff? especially from the guy who talks always about "precompiled problems" outside of the gentoo world and hence can't have any outdated software

Re: false possitive

Am 31.07.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Benny Pedersen: On 2016-07-31 21:42, Martin Hepworth wrote: 3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as latest is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets But i'd really suggest you update i have :=) well, *now* you have,

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 21:42, Martin Hepworth wrote: 3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as latest is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets But i'd really suggest you update i have :=) dovecot.org working on there own problem with 3.3.1 wake up

Re: false possitive

3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as latest is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets But i'd really suggest you update On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 at 20:33, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2016-07-31 21:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > will

Re: false possitive

Am 31.07.2016 um 21:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: so why do you complain in spamassassin list? On 31.07.16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote: is this a question ? of course it is a question. it ends by a question mark. read my post on

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 21:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: will you answer or are you just trolling? oh dear you may make your own problems

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: so why do you complain in spamassassin list? On 31.07.16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote: is this a question ? of course it is a question. it ends by a question mark. read my post on dovecot running a server in pbl why? yes why ? will

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: so why do you complain in spamassassin list? is this a question ? read my post on dovecot running a server in pbl why? yes why ?

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 31.07.16 16:55, Benny Pedersen wrote: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor ? replication seems to be very 5 years) old rule. need sa-update apparently: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6637 rule

Re: false possitive

Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor? On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote: fix your setup, that rule don't exist [root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA /usr/share/spamassassin

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 20:46, Reindl Harald wrote: don't care so please ignore me with a autoreader in sieve, if you just reply to dont care mails you miss a lot of time to other nice things

Re: false possitive

Am 31.07.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Benny Pedersen: On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor? fix your setup, that rule don't exist [root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA

Re: false possitive

On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor? fix your setup, that rule don't exist [root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA /usr/share/spamassassin

Re: false possitive

Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor? fix your setup, that rule don't exist [root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA /usr/share/spamassassin /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org

Re: false possitive

On 31.07.16 16:55, Benny Pedersen wrote: 3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor ? replication seems to be very 5 years) old rule. need sa-update apparently: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6637 -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;

false possitive

3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica" missing ancor ? replication

Re: Is greylisting effective? (was Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold)

Am 30.07.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote: > >> Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll: On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15 +0200 Robert Schetterer wrote: