On 2/1/2017 12:56 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
They publish SPF records and DKIM sign everything for competent SMTP
receivers to handle in real-time, AND they publish a HTML version for
humans, and yet someone still finds a reason to complain?
Dave,
After the initial question was raised, it took abo
On 2017-01-30 08:06, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:06:34 -0500
Rob McEwen wrote:
On 1/30/2017 8:54 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
they do and it has been mentioned:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN23997.html
Cool. So Yahoo uses an HTML page that's a pain to process by
computer.
On 1/31/2017 3:22 PM, Zinski, Steve wrote:
Sorry for the trouble, everyone… I had been forwarding the spam through my
personal IMAP account (to test my rule) which was apparently blocking it. I
forwarded it using my gmail account and my new rule fired. I feel like an idiot.
Steve
I suggest yo
On 1/31/2017 3:22 PM, Zinski, Steve wrote:
Sorry for the trouble, everyone… I had been forwarding the spam through my
personal IMAP account (to test my rule) which was apparently blocking it. I
forwarded it using my gmail account and my new rule fired. I feel like an idiot.
No worries. Rookie
Sorry for the trouble, everyone… I had been forwarding the spam through my
personal IMAP account (to test my rule) which was apparently blocking it. I
forwarded it using my gmail account and my new rule fired. I feel like an idiot.
Steve
On 1/31/17, 2:53 PM, "John Hardin" wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 11:53 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Zinski, Steve wrote:
>
> > Here’s the “view source” of the message in question.
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/AnwkAf9t
> >
> > Again, it’s line 88 that I’m trying to match.
>
> ...let's try this again...
>
> A uri rule hi
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Zinski, Steve wrote:
Here’s the “view source” of the message in question.
http://pastebin.com/AnwkAf9t
Again, it’s line 88 that I’m trying to match.
...let's try this again...
A uri rule hits that here:
Jan 31 09:21:07.423 [21842] dbg: rules: ran uri rule __ALL_URI ===
Here’s the “view source” of the message in question.
http://pastebin.com/AnwkAf9t
Again, it’s line 88 that I’m trying to match.
Thanks.
On 1/31/17, 11:36 AM, "John Hardin" wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Zinski, Steve wrote:
> I’m trying to write a custom rule to block a certain t
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Zinski, Steve wrote:
I’m trying to write a custom rule to block a certain type of spam. When I view
the message source, the very last lines of the spam look like this:
http://trc.spammersdomain.com/redirect.php?email=redac...@richmond.edu";>
Every single rule that I’ve
On 1/31/2017 10:45 AM, Zinski, Steve wrote:
Hello, I have a problem that I hope someone can help me with.
I’m trying to write a custom rule to block a certain type of spam.
When I view the message source, the very last lines of the spam look
like this:
src="http://trc.spammersdomain.com/r
Hello, I have a problem that I hope someone can help me with.
I’m trying to write a custom rule to block a certain type of spam. When I view
the message source, the very last lines of the spam look like this:
http://trc.spammersdomain.com/redirect.php?email=redac...@richmond.edu";>
Every sin
On Tuesday 31 January 2017 at 16:45:34, Zinski, Steve wrote:
> Hello, I have a problem that I hope someone can help me with.
>
> I’m trying to write a custom rule to block a certain type of spam. When I
> view the message source, the very last lines of the spam look like this:
How are you seeing
12 matches
Mail list logo
