|\xe2\x80\x8c)
>
> That makes an *enormous* difference:
>
> https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20181121-r1847080-n/UNICODE_OBFU_ZW/detail
>
> Without the normalized version it was only hitting ~5 spams in the
> entire corpus.
I presume the mass checks run with defaults, w
On 11/21/18 12:13 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently noticed spams spreading via amasonses.com and outlook.com.
> hitting DKIMWL_WL_MED that pushed score below threshold.
>
> especially amazonses.com mail seemed to be amazon cloud servers.
>
> Has anyone noticed this
The "right to be forgotten" is the natural outcome of three decades of
self-inflicted pain. Some argue that deleting old e-mails is like re-writing
history. Other, like me, argue that e-mail was born as an informal medium,
different than, for example, a published book or factual evidence of a
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 21 Nov 2018, at 13:03, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>
>> Except for the private right of action provided in GDPR, and small claims
>> court in the U.S.
>
> Are you saying an EU law can create an actionable civil tort claim in a US
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Kevin Miller wrote:
> > My particular favorite fix is, if the mail list has a web preferences
> > page, to go to there and edit the preferences then set the email address
> > to postmaster@localhost. Now it's their problem.
>
> If thay test fqdn it Will be your problem
>
On 21 Nov 2018, at 13:03, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
Except for the private right of action provided in GDPR, and small
claims court in the U.S.
Are you saying an EU law can create an actionable civil tort claim in a
US state small claims court for actions which are not illegal under any
P.S. I should have added: the whole jurisdiction issue is, clinically
speaking, one of the most interesting parts of GDPR. I've never seen a law that
so broadly asserted that the country or union from which the law was
promulgated will enforce it anywhere and everywhere - it's pretty damned
Hello,
I have recently noticed spams spreading via amasonses.com and outlook.com.
hitting DKIMWL_WL_MED that pushed score below threshold.
especially amazonses.com mail seemed to be amazon cloud servers.
Has anyone noticed this too?
I have disabled DKIMWL_WL_MED for now.
--
Matus UHLAR -
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> There is no reason for anyone without a commercial presence in the EU or CH
> to be concerned with GDPR.
Except for the private right of action provided in GDPR, and small claims court
in the U.S.
And, for entities that spam enough
> John Hardin kirjoitti 21.11.2018 kello 18.52:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Bill Cole wrote:
>
>> On 21 Nov 2018, at 1:56, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>>> While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost because
>>> of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
> John Hardin kirjoitti 21.11.2018 kello 18.52:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Bill Cole wrote:
>
>> On 21 Nov 2018, at 1:56, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>>> While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost because
>>> of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
For this to work with 'normalize_charset 1', \x9d needs to be replaced
with (?:\x9d|\xe2\x80\x8c)
That makes an *enormous* difference:
https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20181121-r1847080-n/UNICODE_OBFU_ZW/detail
Without the normalized version it was only hitting ~5 spams in the entire
corpus.
--
John
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:41, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
The email address is an address, part of your personally identifiable
data.
I'm not disputing that. I write software that deals with PII in my day
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Bill Cole wrote:
On 21 Nov 2018, at 1:56, @lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost because
of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck unexpectedly
asking for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid this
On 21 Nov 2018, at 1:56, @lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost
because of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
unexpectedly asking for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid
this happening again.
Nov 20 10:20:34 mail
On 21 Nov 2018, at 9:03, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:41, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
The US is not a signatory to the GDPR as far as I am aware, and I
have
*no* legal presence outside the US.
The US signed a bilateral agreement with the EU:
On 21 Nov 2018, at 4:04, @lbutlr wrote:
The page at https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy lists
Sought rules as recommended. The link leads to
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules which states "this is
no longer active, and should not be used.”
Fixed.
@lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost because of
the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck unexpectedly asking
for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid this happening again.
Nov 20 10:20:34 mail postfix/pipe[73448]:
On 21/11/18 07:56, @lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost because of
the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck unexpectedly asking
for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid this happening again.
Nov 20 10:20:34 mail
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:41, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>> The email address is an address, part of your personally identifiable
>> data.
>
> I'm not disputing that. I write software that deals with PII in my day job.
>
>> If an identifiable entity in
The page at https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy lists Sought
rules as recommended. The link leads to
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules which states "this is no
longer active, and should not be used.”
--
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity
21 matches
Mail list logo
