Re: OT: Trigger words in email addresses?

On 08/04/2024 11:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote: Now here's my question (at least one of them)... I send the validation email from DoNotReply So... recommendations, please... should I change donotre...@.com to something else, and if so, what is Typically, noreply@... is used Have you tried

Re: OT: Trigger words in email addresses?

GMail just... sucks. I have an email server in EC2 that also passes all tests, but they insist on dumping our emails into users' spam folders. Good luck trying to get anyone at GMail to actually do their jobs and change whatever is causing them to mark your emails as spam. In my case, they are

Re: OT: Trigger words in email addresses?

On 4/8/24 5:44 AM, Antony Stone wrote: - make your systems transparent so that people feel they understand what's happening and when at different stages in the process - don't create a "corporate black box" which customers can't understand I'll add to this and say that URLs that include

Re: Weird whitelist

Hi Jimmy in SA like: There might be some Spam/Phishing emails with null sender so spamassassin will help you block it if you configured them correctly.. header    SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN    Return-Path =~ /<>/ describe  SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN    spamik score SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN             

Re: Weird whitelist

Hi Problem solved: user in wbl sql add in amavis_recipients his domain W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:50, Jimmy pisze: According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of the Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This specification indicates that no Delivery

Re: Weird whitelist

According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of the Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This specification indicates that no Delivery Status Notification (DSN) messages or other notifications about successful or unsuccessful delivery should be sent in

Re: OT: Trigger words in email addresses?

On Monday 08 April 2024 at 05:15:58, Grant Taylor via users wrote: > Below is my opinion, it's worth everything you paid for it. But I do > suggest you read it and think about it for a few minutes. For what it's worth, I thoroughly agree with these opinions. - don't alienate people by sending

Re: Weird whitelist

W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:38, Benny Pedersen pisze: natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31: Apr  6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <> -> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id: 6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888,

Re: Weird whitelist

natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31: Apr 6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <> -> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id: 6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888, queued_as: 4VBDq06n69z1Q9q1, 358 ms I check and I not

Re: Weird whitelist

W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote: I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted" ... Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted sender <>, ... Log: Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17)

Re: Weird whitelist

On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote: I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted" ... Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted sender <>, ... Log: Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking: 6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> -> Apr  6 01:15:08

Weird whitelist

Hi I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted" ... Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted sender <>, ... Log: Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking: 6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> -> Apr  6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: