On ons 28 okt 2009 15:42:19 CET, Adam Katz wrote
[snip]
forging one of them. My plugin maches userna...@domain1 to
userna...@domain2 if username1 == username2 regardless of domain.
legit users can not use smtp auth ?, hmm :)
--
xpoint
On fre 30 okt 2009 16:39:04 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
Once again, I'm finding a piece of spam getting through
because of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4 .
what is the ip ?
http://www.dnswl.org/ make a request for change
dont change problem in sa
--
xpoint
On fre 30 okt 2009 19:45:13 CET, Michael Scheidell wrote
ICANN Approves Use Of Non-Latin Alphabets In Web Domain Names
if the domain names conform to idn standard its okay with me
--
xpoint
On ons 04 nov 2009 15:10:45 CET, polloxx wrote
Is the spamassassin development dead?
On the website there's: 2008-06-12: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 has been released.
join the dev maillist and ask the same question there, but as i see
it, it being working on make sa 3.3.x stable for so long time now
On søn 08 nov 2009 11:44:05 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 10:39 +, Chip M. wrote:
Ugh. I just checked Twitter, and no SPF record. :(
No?
twitter might use another domain for signup ?, no :)
same as facebook.com does not use this domain for signup emails
On man 09 nov 2009 13:56:27 CET, Casartello, Thomas wrote
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
now.
why not enable it ?
but for others:
give a big spam score for rfc-i
give a big ham score for users at hotmail that does not spam you
meta RFC_ABUSE_POST
On tir 10 nov 2009 15:26:43 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Please keep this in your mind in future before trotting out that tired
old gas.
imho Ralf have never being banned in maillist here, if you dont like
his answers just unsubscribe
--
xpoint
On fre 13 nov 2009 04:41:36 CET, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote
I'd like a brainstorm to convince that a RBL solution is not the best stoping
SPAM, and we should look for L7 solution such as Bayes.
and ip's is not part of bayes db ...
--
xpoint
On fre 13 nov 2009 18:26:07 CET, wrote
One admin admitted that they were hacked through login guest / pass guest
and this is a real hack :)
--
xpoint
On lør 14 nov 2009 07:25:20 CET, Alex wrote
Any ideas what I could be missing on catching this one? Please let me
know if I can provide any additional information.
score DKIM_SIGNED 5
score USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -5.0
whitelist_from_dkim fri...@sbcglobal.net
--
xpoint
On lør 14 nov 2009 17:31:11 CET, Alex wrote
That's a good idea, but an administrative nightmare with many users,
particularly with the fail first, correct later attitude, they would
kill me.
i maked a script in php that dump horde addressbook to whitelist_auth.cf
put that in a daily cron,
On lør 14 nov 2009 20:11:09 CET, Homer Parker wrote
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 18:58 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i maked a script in php that dump horde addressbook to
whitelist_auth.cf
Only if everyone uses webmail...
so how do i solve other problems ?
if you make me a ldap addressbook
On søn 15 nov 2009 18:47:49 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
http://pastebin.com/m730f90e9
winnow.malware.8163
--
xpoint
On fre 20 nov 2009 21:07:00 CET, Mark Hedges wrote
Hi. I've set up my own rbldnsd server. It's responding to
queries correctly, for example, I am trying to block the
server that this message comes from, 64.22.103.163.
spamassassin 21 -D metadata -t msg | less
the ip above is not in the
On søn 22 nov 2009 17:00:37 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Is there a way to include these locations into the rules path at all?
sa-update already use includes
man sa-update
--
xpoint
On tir 24 nov 2009 01:11:38 CET, LuKreme wrote
I used it all the time. And you WILL 'block' legitimate mail.
and thats always sender to decide its legitimate :)
i see a pattern there
--
xpoint
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:22:25 CET, R-Elists wrote
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
+1
even without more devel on it, what does miss ?
so far i have just seen one big problem with it, dns servers /
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and
cron'd replication lag...
just one problem with freemail it should list all domain as freemail
as default, unless there is a clear sign of payment to get it
otherway
On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
seems simpler than adding 1 domains to freemail's config .-)
that why i like to change it to be paidmail.pm with lists of paid domains
got it now ? :)
spammers can get any free domain and it can continue as a freemail,
but
On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Any more ranges most welcome :-)
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
--
xpoint
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
priceless reply-to
--
xpoint
On fre 27 nov 2009 18:08:23 CET, Allen Chen wrote
DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too much email traffic.
install bind, check spamhaus dnsbl in sendmail, add more internal spam
tests in sendmail, dont add to much dnsbl in sendmail, and i have
found spamcop is more for
On søn 29 nov 2009 12:59:32 CET, Jonas Eckerman wrote
I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA
install) would pay to use the better DNSBLs.
ask recipient if a isp does a well good job of stopping spam to ones
inbox, payed dnsbl or not :=)
shared rbl listes is silly,
On man 30 nov 2009 10:56:47 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
Priceless? Bullshit. Useless and annoying. Breaks (or at least makes harder)
possibility for private replies.
i wont solve all worlds problems, but seem reply-to is missused allot
out there
I sometimes send private reply
On man 30 nov 2009 16:08:53 CET, Chris Santerre wrote
I'm not fully awake yet but it looks like my blocking numbers from RBLs
tripled over weekend.
what RBLs are you on ? :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On man 30 nov 2009 21:36:09 CET, Alex wrote
You don't need SpamAssassin to do this. Most modern mail servers
(postfix, sendmail, Exchange) can do this by default. Remove the
default forwarding of non-existent addresses from being delivered to a
general postmaster account, and explicitly define
On man 30 nov 2009 21:54:37 CET, Thomas Harold wrote
In general... no. Unless the other company is willing to give you
access to their internal list of valid email accounts.
well there is no point for spamassassin to know if a sender is valid
recipient or not, whats counts for spamassassin
On tir 01 dec 2009 00:51:38 CET, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote
So if you have a crappy connection towards your mailserver Marc you
can get listed, thats rather funny, and annoying. Connections do
break also when not running a botnet... pfff
maybe i am dump, but what do you mean by the above
On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wrote
I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server
connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to
issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that
alone would be ridiculous.
if its this i would agree,
On tir 01 dec 2009 12:27:58 CET, Mike Cardwell wrote
When I say, you, I'm refering to the people using the JMF lists,
not specifically you Benny.
if it was just for me you would post it on maillists ? :)
thanks for clearify it, atleast for me
--
xpoint
On tir 01 dec 2009 16:59:12 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
servers that your mail should be greylisted because it attempts to
'send mail' to too many non-existent addresses. One more reason to
NOT verify addresses this way.
well KISS to yahoo for not setting spf for there domains so we dont
i think it could be added to freemail.pm to test if sender domain have
spf or dkim and if no spf and or no dkim consider it as a freemail
domain ?
i dont know if it require code changes to do this, but it make sense
for me atleast to make it, no ?
objection, flames as i like to know
On ons 09 dec 2009 14:56:53 CET, LuKreme wrote
I don't speak German, however with the help of Google I think the
answer to your question is 'you don't'. As I recall, when moving
from file-based bayes to MySQL based bayes, you have to retrain.
no just --backup filebased bayes, and
On tir 15 dec 2009 00:32:31 CET, mouss wrote
head
Can all the guys who think 20 isn't much send me 10$ each? I promise to
write a song for you.
/head
what if the snail postman did not get paid ?, how many snailmails
would not be sent ?, its wonder me that email is completely free of
charge
On tir 15 dec 2009 08:25:00 CET, Rajkumar S wrote
I have pasted one such (slightly edited) mail at http://pastebin.ca/1715399
http://sa.hege.li/
to me it looks like a gmail user trying to get more users sending
there login and passwords then what ever it really is ?
--
xpoint
On tir 15 dec 2009 15:44:50 CET, Jeff Koch wrote
in has a tag. A tag of two characters would allow users to quickly
identify the email as coming from the SA mailing list and decide
whether the email is worth opening.
in the header:
List-Id:users.spamassassin.apache.org
in sieve
On tir 15 dec 2009 17:22:44 CET, Marc Perkel wrote
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
Get a modern email client.
helps more to get a better os :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On tir 15 dec 2009 17:31:54 CET, Marc Perkel wrote
Get a modern email client. Are you using a KSR33 teletype on a 110
baud modem?
why are you offtopic now ?
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On tir 15 dec 2009 17:36:56 CET, Toni Mueller wrote
HTML in emails is usually a synonym for F*CKING SH*T.
most users that try doing it is maybe just trying to write in red or white :)
but yes, i will also say html is not for email, but so many clients
have it as default i have giving up
On tir 15 dec 2009 18:22:00 CET, Jeff Koch wrote
How could a two character tag like SA be annoying? You must never
use a blackberry or iPhone to check your email either.
open your eyes and see more, both the above smartphones above can
handle imap just fine, but i just test it from nokia
On tir 15 dec 2009 18:52:44 CET, Jeff Koch wrote
Of course an iPhone can see IMAP folders. But what's going to sort
mail into folders when I'm traveling for a week and the office PC is
turned off?
never tryed a google email at gmail ?
well sieve is the answer, not the clients problem you
On ons 16 dec 2009 12:10:11 CET, Res wrote
no whitelist should ever become default part of SA, the day it is,
is the day I look elsewhere.
please post on this maillist what you do when you find replacement for sa
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On ons 16 dec 2009 16:23:23 CET, LuKreme wrote
whitelist_from_dkim *...@buffetsinc.com bluehornet.com
the correct syntax for whitelisting these emails?
syntax is ok, but
i would not use whitelist_from_dkim with a willcard domain, imho its better to
def_whitelist_from_dkim
On ons 16 dec 2009 16:49:52 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/asr33.shtml
There was actually a time when I had one of those in my house.
For your amusement:
I still have my old Commodore 64 and 1541
On fre 18 dec 2009 08:13:31 CET, Christian Brel wrote
* [212.159.7.100 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Yet the same IP is on and off SORBS and part of an ongoing spam
problem. Perhaps this can be reviewed and given a zero score by default?
see dnswl homepage, there is NONE, LOW, MED, HI, the
On fre 18 dec 2009 10:07:55 CET, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote
If you like you can transparently disable the DNSWLs.
or create a bug to have dnswl use trusted_networks from local.cf in
spamassassin
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
pgpfoovQHfqN5.pgp
Description: PGP
On fre 18 dec 2009 10:23:48 CET, Christian Brel wrote
If you like you can transparently disable the DNSWLs.
I found it much more useful to apply them as blocklists and give the a
+4/+8 myself - but that's a personal choice.
and No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL is also a personal
On Fri 18 Dec 2009 07:09:03 PM CET, Per Jessen wrote
Completely agree, but the ZX80/1 made computers very, very affordable. I
was 15 when I managed to convince my parents that I desperately needed
one of those. Back in 1981,
zx80 was 1980 imho, and had just 1k ram, and 8k rom, fully
On Fri 18 Dec 2009 07:42:55 PM CET, R-Elists wrote
or create a bug to have dnswl use trusted_networks from
local.cf in spamassassin
can you help me / us better understand what you are getting at here and why?
example:
trusted_networks 127.128.0.0/16
and then if 127.128.128.128 is listed in
On Mon 04 Jan 2010 04:21:02 PM CET, Greg Troxel wrote
http://www.lexort.com/spam/spam-ipv6-cn.txt
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 03 Jan 2010
22:17:05 -0500 (EST)
you are on ipv4, any ip whitelisted or ?
--
On Tue 05 Jan 2010 09:59:15 PM CET, Michael Scheidell wrote
and if someone wants to get linkedin email, they should get a
hotmail or gmail account.
talk about bussiness now ?
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 07:01:04 PM CET, Rich Shepard wrote
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I have init.pre, v310.pre, and
v312.pre files.
which would be a non-default location.
Almost all SA-related files are in /etc/mail/spamassassin/; that's where
the Slackware package installs everything. If
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 08:07:12 PM CET, Rich Shepard wrote
Should I copy the .pre files to /usr/share/spamassassin?
no do not copy, edit the files in there place where thay got installed
spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less
I can post the results, but the final error still is:
check: no loaded
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 08:19:13 PM CET, LuKreme wrote
I have been bouncing these to gmail, but I know that's useless. Not
sure what do do since I don't want to scan mailing-lists.
send this mail to maillist-owner and or abuse at google, seem this
maillist have a spammer connected on this
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 08:45:40 PM CET, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote
check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
line 164.
What plugin do I need to have loaded to resolve this error?
It looks like you are missing
Original-Envelope-ID: c=US;a=
;p=HUNDREDACREWOOD;l=CHRISROBIN-100111200457Z-1594
Reporting-MTA: dns; chrisrobin.hundredacrewood.local
Final-Recipient: RFC822;
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 09:14:06 PM CET, LuKreme wrote
google, seem this maillist have a spammer connected on this
maillist where you recieve the spam from a valid maillist at
google, so report it as spam to them
I never subscribed to the list in question. I am, in fact, not
subscribed to any
On Tue 12 Jan 2010 07:48:23 AM CET, Christian Brel wrote
http://pastebin.com/m66a5a2ae
X-Virus-Status: Infected (Sanesecurity.Junk.25057.UNOFFICIAL)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 02:53:13 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote
saupdates.openprotect.com channel which contains recommended SAREs
rules and all is working!
outdated sare rules is not recommended, and openprotect do care ? :)
if you update sare rules via sa-update it would work, if you do some
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 04:11:45 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote
I'll certainly add sought.rules.yerp.org and
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net to updates.spamassassin.org as
suggested by Jason.
delete all files in the 3.2.5 sa update dir, use sa-update again
so all sa-update rules gets loaded,
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 05:54:58 PM CET, Skaz wrote
Sadly SPF won't catch this type of spam as that only deals with the envelope
and the faked field is in the body. We already have SPF set up anyhow which
obviously catches a fair few faked HELO's.
ug :/
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 08:39:13 PM CET, Mike Wallace wrote
I do this but it only works for rejecting a forged envelope. It
doesn't work if it's only a forged From header which the example
shows.
and you get spam from spf pass domains where From: is spf fail ?
Does anyone know of a way to
since 3.2.1 is still stable in gentoo portage would make sense to
update rules on this for that bug ?
--
xpoint
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301125
hope it gets resolved now, point for me is that 3.2.5 is only marked
unstable in gentoo, and i tryed to make another server with just
stable ebuilds to see where remaining problems is
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Sun 17 Jan 2010 10:05:13 PM CET, tonjg wrote
so if there is no 'use_bayes' entry in local.cf does that mean bayes is
disabled by default?
spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less
is this line not a FAQ by now ?
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Sun 17 Jan 2010 10:33:24 PM CET, tonjg wrote
[29394] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes from @INC
bayes plugin is loaded
[29394] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
is BerkelayDB working in generic on this computer ?
is perl
On Sun 17 Jan 2010 11:43:19 PM CET, tonjg wrote
ls -l /root/.spamassassin
would just liked to permissions on this dir
try delete it and see what happends
this command gives:
total 0
sa-learn --ham --showdots msg
sa-learn --dump magic
sa-learn --spam --showdots msg
sa-learn --dump magic
On Fri 22 Jan 2010 05:08:05 AM CET, LuKreme wrote
On Jan 21, 2010, at 20:24, Rick Knight rick_kni...@rlknight.com wrote:
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin.
You shouldn't be sending ANY
On Sat 23 Jan 2010 07:35:43 PM CET, RobertH wrote
why is the account or accounts that create the Delivery Status Notification
(Failure) bounces from administra...@willspc.net still subscribed to the
list?
it does not bounce to apache org, only to subscribers :)
just hoped that maillist-owner
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 05:55:21 PM CET, Evan Platt wrote
Won't work, AFAIK. You need to reply to the unsub request to confirm it.
Otherwise, you would be able to unsubscribe anyone :)
why did the bounce not go to apache.org ?, or did it, but apache.org
did not see the problem in maillist ?
not
On Sat, February 23, 2008 15:52, Dave Koontz wrote:
I am still getting some Storm Worm messages that are not being caught,
even with Sane Security / ClamAV. I thought I'd write a rule to score
any URL that has a dot exe, scr or pif extension. However, my rule is
not working. Can someone
On Mon, February 25, 2008 16:18, Chris wrote:
Unsubscribe
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in squirrelmail i just press a bottom :-)
On Tue, February 26, 2008 09:49, Anthony Peacock wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this. At this stage I am planning on
changing the score for all HABEAS_ACCREDITED_??? rules to 0, to make
them neutral to the score.
score 0 disables the test
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/habeas-misfire.eml
disable DomainKey plugin and add DKIM plugin will help on that msg
and search on DKIM mta scores for not being sent from a DKIM signer
It appears that Postfix only does DNS blacklists and not whitelists
then. I was going to publish my whitelist and Postfix instructions but I
guess I can't do that.
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Communications/Email-Filters/maRBL-16435.shtml
this link helps :-)
test for rbl blacklist and if
created a patch so it does
--- /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/70_sare_uri_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net/200510102200.cf.orig 2008-02-25 06:15:39.0 +0100
+++ /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/70_sare_uri_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net/200510102200.cf 2008-02-27 18:21:47.0 +0100
@@
rbl=hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com/127.0.0.1; action=OK whitelisted
suggest change OK to permit_auth_destination or DUNNO
rbl=hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com/127.0.0.2; action=REJECT blacklisted
rbl=hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com/127.0.0.3; action=PREPEND X-Karma: yellow
.. among many other
running on Perl version 5.8.5
upgrade, and let us know problem later
if i remember unicode was a problem before 5.8.8
i seem to have a problem with Mail::DKIM 0.22 and sa 3.2.4 dkim plugin
that do not work with sigatures gmail uses
i upgraded Mail::DKIM to 0.26 but now i get this
[7106] dbg: dkim: no wl entries match author [EMAIL PROTECTED], no need
to verify sigs
[7106] dbg: dkim: performing public key lookup
my host is gentoo based with latest updates, atleast i hope
upgrade Mail::DKIM to 0.30-1 where it works, thanks will try to get it
bumped version on gentoo
Is there a way to realise this in SA.
http://ixhash.sourceforge.net/
Hello Listmaster or whoever will read it,
add spf to freenet.de would help the clueless :-)
Is there a way to realise this in SA.
http://ixhash.sourceforge.net/
That is a good starting point for writing a plugin to do something
similar but the OP wants to hash the subject not the body.
subject is part of the body
I started doing this a while ago in addition to using ixhash.
how
my host is gentoo based with latest updates, atleast i hope
Was using Mail::DKIM 26, right?
all older then 0.30-1 fails
why i tested 0.22 and 0.26 is that its the only in gentoo portage
On Sun, March 9, 2008 19:01, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I guess I'm still not being clear. There are 120K emails a day coming
to INVALID EMAIL ADDRESSES THAT NEVER EXISTED.
this is a ERROR IN YOUR DUMP SENDMAIL :=)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody
FIX IT !
Benny
On Mon, March 10, 2008 14:11, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf have following directives:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
remove this line in local.cf
find the plugin in one of the *.pre files and enable the plugin from there
should fix the problem
Benny
mail with will be recorded in AWL db with from, ip, score
when a spammer users YOUR email it will be recorded with from, ip, score
ip will most time stop the spammer here :-)
Thanks for your help.
no problem
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
user_prefs files
since as user, i can't change system installed files.
its designed as with secureity in mind
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Thu, March 13, 2008 14:18, Matt Kettler wrote:
USER_IN_WHITELIST means the message matched a whitelist_from,
whitelist_from_rcvd, or whitelist_from_spf statement in your configfiles.
spf no
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
version from 2002)
could olso just mean its stable
atleast it is here
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
sure do, we are all here to help later even if it looks good later olso
Sorry i've asked.
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, March 19, 2008 13:21, James E. Pratt wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m8520d64
http://pastebin.com/m159c02de
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/90664
Botnet plugin hits them nicely
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
, and the
sender ip is olso a botnet without reverse dns, botnet plugin finds this
http://pastebin.com/m493f478c
for spamassassin get the jm sought rules, it hits there
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
| trusted_networks192.168.8.0/24
192.168.3.0/24
Then, an (untrusted but internal) host like 192.168.3.24 sends a
mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The generated header is
or change to 192.168.0.0/16
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
to but not open to the
whole world
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Tue, March 25, 2008 10:40, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a problem that mails from internal (private) IPs generate
SPF_FAIL hits. E.g. my configuration is
| internal_networks 62.153.82.30
| internal_networks 192.168.0.0/16
the maintainers were tired of all the queries.
05/01/07: ORDB is gone - Remove from your mailserver!
maybe spammers want to take over that domain, lol :)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, March 26, 2008 09:24, Enrico Scholz wrote:
| msa_networks192.168.0.0/16
spamassassin 21 -D spf -t /tmp/msg /tmp/msg.spf.debug
post the debug file
/tmp/msg is a email where it happends
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
to self should be ignored by the AWL.
(it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so this
makes AWL more useful)
better configure awl to weight scores better to what trustness you want from it
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
see the factor setting in usersettings
Benny
On Thu, March 27, 2008 11:28, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
spamassassin 21 -D spf -t /tmp/msg /tmp/msg.spf.debug
post the debug file
https://www.cvg.de/people/ensc/spf_fail.txt
info: generic: trusted_networks doesn't contain msa_networks entry
301 - 400 of 3176 matches
Mail list logo
