- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know of a POC to report phishing msgs that the
mailpolice rbl misses?
I sent an e-mail to a contact at MP to see who these could be sent to.
You can also forward them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which
will get them
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brodbelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brodbelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you happen to check the INSTALL document that comes with the
distribution?:
- Net::DNS(from CPAN)
Aha. Whoever
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Lynn Frank wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
We use SA 3.0.0 with MySQL so we can extract certain AWL data and use
it at the MTA level. However, since SA doesn't have an auto-blacklist
feature,
Hi Robin,
- Original Message -
From: Brett Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of these entries are in the debug. So far, everything is setup and
running as it should. Just nothing coming through on the reporting. Any
suggestions?
Sorry, don't know what else to tell you. I spawn SA via
- Original Message -
From: Brett Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried this but still don't get the SPF results. Any other
suggestions?
Does it only appear if the header info is non SPF? Or, when does it
appear?
No, the header and log entries will only appear if there is either a
- Original Message -
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Run spamassassin with -D, it'll tell you what files its reading. Could
be
/usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf, user_prefs, etc.
Okay, I created a test.cf file and added the following entries (with hyphens
-):
header
- Original Message -
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:30:53PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Anyone have an idea why I would be getting the following output when I
run
sa-learn --dump magic:
error: rule 'DNS_FROM_RFCI-PIGS' has invalid characters
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Software Foundation Announces SpamAssassin 3.0 Release
Very sad that the Pyzor time-out issue never got resolved throughout the
pre-release/RC process, since I reported the time-out issue very early on in
the
- Original Message -
From: Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
=
1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a
faked
- Original Message -
From: Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, follow-up question:
Where does SpamAssassin get the IP? Is it the oldest IP in the received
headers (low), or the most recent (top)?
If it is oldest (assuming originating IP), then that could be faked easily
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We turned off AWL, we had a customer that forwarded two spam messages to
our helpdesk, the third normal message never came in, since his AWL beat
him...
Probably should not be spam filtering postmaster/abuse/support
- Original Message -
From: William Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good afternoon, Raymond, all,
(Raymond, you probably already know this, but I wanted to quickly
cover it for other people that may also be considering whether or not to
use AWL).
[SNIP]
That's a different issue.
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably unrealistic to expect customers to know how to bounce a
message.
Yes. Exactly my point.
Much better to simply not spam filter critical e-mail accounts like
postmaster/abuse/support/sales/etc.
With around
This is a list that MailPolice hosts and I have been running it for a few
hours and it has already flagged some phish and fraud e-mails. Here is some
info about the list: http://rhs.mailpolice.com/#rhsfraud
This is my configuration for SA 2.64 with the SpamCopURI plug-in:
uri MP_URI_RBL
I'm curious how to determine why a message gets flagged with autolearn=no,
as shown below:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no
version=2.60-spambr_20030926a
Also, what does this version=2.60-spambr_20030926a mean? This was a very
obvious pill spam
[Top Post]
I'm actually running 2.64 (3.0 soon). Everyone, please disregard the former
distraction and return to your regularly scheduled, bi-annual subject line
debate... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users
Please let us all know if your test was successful...
- Original Message -
From: Michele Neylon : Blacknight Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:01 AM
Subject: test
Test.
--
Email scanned by
- Original Message -
From: Codger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the fact that they do create the SPF records then makes all the
other rules like SURBL more effective. The strength they have had till
SPF has been the fact that the could forge domains.
If you already use a blacklisting
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would you care to share some of your strategies, perhaps off
list?
Share his strategies, yes, but also check out his product. MessageSniffer,
it's a truly awesome spam-filtering product and runs very efficiently on
Linux/BSD
- Original Message -
From: kaiser suse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
list of cloudmark servers?
Don't know if there is a master list somewhere, but here are the razor
servers that I know of:
folly.cloudmark.com
201 - 220 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
