Hi,
running FreeBSD I have two directories with rules in it:
/usr/local/share/spamassassin
/var/db/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org
Which is the correct directory, which rules are used?
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol
Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does libkrb5.so.8 exist (usually in /usr/lib/)?!
no.
installed heimdal then krb5 from ports, no problem. re-booted. same
msgs as before in sshd logs. sshd won't allow any logins. and complains
same as before.
Did you install security/krb5 or
Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does libkrb5.so.8 exist (usually in /usr/lib/)?!
no.
installed heimdal then krb5 from ports, no problem. re-booted. same
msgs as before in sshd logs. sshd won't allow any logins. and complains
same
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:42:41AM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
So /var/db/spamassassin/version/updates_spamassassin_org has precedence
over /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin? Some kind of version checking or
rather the existence of the rules file? What
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
FWIW, the directories and their order are well documented in the
spamassassin
POD.
Could you please point me to the exact location? Thanks.
(you could also use man)
$ perldoc
Hi,
I would like to do some whitelisting for an external mailing list. I found
whitelist_from and whitelist_auth but they automatically score -100. Is
there a way to use whitelist_* or something similiar with a custom score?
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:12 +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I would like to do some whitelisting for an external mailing list. I
found
whitelist_from and whitelist_auth but they automatically score -100.
Is
there a way to use whitelist_* or something similiar with a custom score?
amavisd-new
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and
is no longer supported, ignoring.
Jun 2
David Michaels wrote:
Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[...]
timing: total 36840 ms - init: 3827 (10.4%), parse: 43 (0.1%),
extract_message_metadata: 822 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 178
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
What distinguishes 'certain mails'? Length? Content? Mime
attachements?
It's around 1 of 1000, I caught one that was a HTML mail, 100kB
Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[...]
Any idea where to start?
Appendix: I set up a fresh and clean FreeBSD 8.0 with only SA 3.3.1 and
Perl 5.10.1_1 and the problem still persists. I then removed all
packages, compiled perl
Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
I might have been able to catch a non-confident example mail[1] (bad
example because of the size, but an example).
While SA 3.2.5 needs ~45 seconds, with SA 3.3.1:
Jun 4 03:36:41.029 [56496
Hi,
I set
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn1
bayes_expiry_max_db_size30
bayes_auto_expire 1
bayes_store_module
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
bayes_sql_dsn
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 6:04 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
bayes_auto_expire 1
disable auto expire and run a cronjob.
OK...but..why? :)
make sure you run the cronjob for each user in bayes.
The database ist global...
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 7:56 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 6:04 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
bayes_auto_expire 1
disable auto expire and run a cronjob.
OK...but..why? :)
to fix your problem.
[helmut
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 8:16 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
1295442708,
Last: 1295442672, atime: 0, count: 0, newdelta: 0, ratio: 0, period:
43200
or, it has been trying (automatically) for a while. remove auto
expire (at least)
done.
change to this also
bayes_store_module
RW wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:16:09 + (UTC)
Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 7:56 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/19/11 6:04 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
bayes_auto_expire
Hi,
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM externally and
forwarded to SA. The mailrelays of the external provider are listed in
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails are not recognized as SPAM externally
Dave Funk wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Short story:
Can I exclude hosts from RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/MED/HI?
Long story:
We are using an external provider to filter SPAM. We also use SA
internally. Sometimes mails
Kris Deugau wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
If I understood you correctly I'd need to add all relays of
MessageLabs to trusted_networks and also track any IP address
changes...
If you don't have that info, and their support refuses to tell you,
tailing your inbound logs for a while
Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de
wrote:
It looks like RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED examines firstuntrusted and if he
trusts his MX/relays correctly then this shouldn't be happening.
In general, setting up the trustpath correctly is sufficient
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
but if their support refuses to tell you, I'd be looking at
switching providers
I guess they would if they knew themselves. But project switch is
ongoing... :)
http://images.messagelabs.com/EmailResources
Hi,
after a discussion here on September 12th I added MessageLabs to
trusted_networks. If I understood posts in the net correctly this might
be the reason why whitelist_ does not work anymore.
Mar 13 14:44:04.119 [17641] dbg: spf: relayed through one or more
trusted relays, cannot use
Benny Pedersen wrote:
Helmut Schneider skrev den 2013-03-13 15:19:
How can I whiltelist(_auth) senders now?
if sender ip is whitelisted, does it then make sense to whitelist
based on dkim/spf ?
note here dkim is not using ip at all
?
I want to whitelist email adresses, not IPs
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -rs
OpenBSD 4.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
When I run sa-update I get the error below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sa-update --nogpg
can't resolve localhost to address at
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
line 751.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sa-update --nogpg
can't resolve localhost to address at
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
line 751.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
A guess-- you have
server localhost
in /etc/resolv.conf.
In deed,
From: Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, June 15, 2007 08:20, Helmut Schneider wrote:
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sa-update --nogpg
can't resolve localhost to address at
/usr
local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
line 751
Hi,
I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary files to
the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl: initializing
Mail::SpamAssassin
Error
From: Leon Kolchinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary files
to
the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl:
From: Leon Kolchinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid question, but $MYHOME = /var/amavis ?
Yes
Also you can try to debug it with strace.
Look for all the files you're missing in the jail and copy them into it.
(here is a little example on how to use strace to find requirements
outside the jail -
From: Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[problems resolving a host]
Damn!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /var/amavis/test2.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use Net::DNS;
my $res = Net::DNS::Resolver-new;
my $query = $res-search(www.google.de);
if ($query) {
foreach my $rr ($query-answer
From: Leon Kolchinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've never run amavisd-new in chroot, but may be you'll find some tips
here - http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.chroot Seems to me
like a resolver issue (probably need to configure FreeBSD a little
different than OpenBSD). Best Regards,
Well,
Hi,
I use amavisd-new 2.52 and SA3.21 chroot'ed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# grep -ir report_safe
/var/amavis/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# report_safe 1
report_safe 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin --lint -d
[...]
[15632] dbg: config: read file
From: Wolfgang Zeikat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 07/12/07 15:47, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I use amavisd-new 2.52 and SA3.21 chroot'ed.
Is there a setting that only mail with a hit greater than X is modified?
Or did I miss anything else?
AFAIK, amavisd-new has it's own ways of using SA
Hi,
sorry if I missed something but is there also a digest version of the
mailing list? I searched http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
but only found subscribe and unsubscribe.
Thanks, Helmut
From: SM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:41 18-07-2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
sorry if I missed something but is there also a digest version of
the mailing list? I searched
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists but only found
subscribe and unsubscribe.
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
can I (and if how) create a filter that catches mails _from_and_to_ specific
email addresses? It should only apply if a specific sender sendw an email to
a specific recipient.
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
can I (and if how) create a filter that catches mails _from_and_to_
specific email addresses? It should only apply if a specific sender
sendw an email to a specific recipient.
I can use a meta rule, thanks.
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My
Hi,
I tried to move a global (not per user) bayes-db to mysql5.0 to use it with
3 different machines.
From local.cf:
use_bayes 1
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
bayes_sql_dsn DBI:mysql:SpamAssassin
bayes_sql_username amavis
Micke Andersson m...@swemic.net wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I tried to move a global (not per user) bayes-db to mysql5.0 to use it
with 3 different machines.
From local.cf:
use_bayes 1
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
bayes_sql_dsn
Hi,
where can I find a complete set of (bayes) options for local.cf? Either it's
well hidden or even http://spamassassin.apache.org/ does not provide such a
list.
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
where can I find a complete set of (bayes) options for local.cf?
Either it's well hidden or even http://spamassassin.apache.org/ does
not provide such a list.
Thanks, Helmut
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc
I am using the 3.0 line of SpamAssassin and it's being invoked through
amavisd-maia
(Maia Mailguard.) I have a certain domain name that's blocked in several
of the
URIDNSBL lists as fm.interia.pl however my DNSBL checks are only doing
interia.pl
Just as I'm curious, what does SA score that
Hi,
all over sudden all my installations (3.3.1 and 3.3.2) show
rules: meta test AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS6 has undefined dependency
'__AC_RHASH_URIb'
when checking rules. Whats's wrong?
Thanks, Helmut
Helmut Schneider wrote:
all over sudden all my installations (3.3.1 and 3.3.2) show
To be more precise:
Feb 18 20:48:03.261 [68576] dbg: rules: meta test
AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS6 has undefined dependency '__AC_RHASH_URIb'
Feb 18 20:48:03.261 [68576] dbg: rules: meta test
AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS6
Hi,
over the last weeks I constantly run into issues when I cannot get SA
up again because of broken rule sets. Today it's
Apr 6 17:06:01.960 [31092] dbg: rules: meta test HEXHASH_WORD has
undefined dependency '__KAM_BODY_LENGTH_LT_512'
Is something wrong in my process or do we have a problem
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Helmut Schneider wrote:
over the last weeks I constantly run into issues when I cannot get
SA up again because of broken rule sets. Today it's
Apr 6 17:06:01.960 [31092] dbg: rules: meta test HEXHASH_WORD has
undefined dependency
Dave Funk wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Helmut Schneider wrote:
over the last weeks I constantly run into issues when I cannot get
SA up again because of broken rule sets. Today it's
Apr 6 17:06:01.960 [31092] dbg: rules: meta test HEXHASH_WORD has
undefined dependency
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Helmut Schneider wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2014, Helmut Schneider wrote:
over the last weeks I constantly run into issues when I cannot
get SA up again because of broken rule sets. Today it's
Apr 6 17:06:01.960
Hi,
for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without success.
I have read https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath and
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FixingAllTrusted carefully, put
trusted_networks 10.0.0.0/8 172.16.0.0/12 192.168.0.0/16
internal_networks 10.0.0.0/8
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 14:55 +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without
> > success.
> >
> > I have read https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 4/11/2016 10:55 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without
> > success.
> >
> > I have read https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath and
> > https://
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2016, at 10:55, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without
> > success.
>
> Did it just start showing up 6 months ago on a previously-working
> SpamAssassin insta
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 9:03, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > Bill Cole wrote:
> >
> > > Pipe that message into "spamassassin -t -D
> > > dns,received-header,metadata" *running as the same user that runs
> > > your Amav
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Bill Cole wrote:
>
> > On 12 Apr 2016, at 9:03, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > Bill Cole wrote:
> > >
> > > > Pipe that message into "spamassassin -t -D
> > > > dns,received-header,metadata"
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 15.04.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Helmut Schneider:
> > What does "submission" mean in this context?
>
> ESMT(S)A
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTP_Authentication
I'm neither using authentication nor smtp submission (TCP587).
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true I
> came along the following lines when debugging SA:
>
> Apr 15 11:44:43.211 mail /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[9991]: (09991-02) SA
> dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=172.20.12.10 rdns=
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100
> RW wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (UTC)
> > Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always
> &g
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:08:15 + (UTC)
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > RW wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:35:24 +0100
> > > RW wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:10:13 + (
Hi,
when further investigating my issue that ALL_TRUSTED is always true I
came along the following lines when debugging SA:
Apr 15 11:44:43.211 mail /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[9991]: (09991-02) SA
dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=172.20.12.10 rdns=relay-in
helo=mail2 by=mail01 ident= envfrom=
Hi,
I'm trying to find out why a message sometimes hits whitelist_from_rcvd
and sometimes does not. I checked the headers again and again but
cannot see the difference.
whitelist_from_rcvd quarant...@eu.quarantine.symantec.com messagelabs.com
whitelist_from_rcvd
62 matches
Mail list logo
