The UUism Networks MailScanner believes that the attachment to this message
sent to you
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 40comcast.net detected as URI
may be Unsolicited Commercial Email (spam). Unless you are sure that this
message is incorrectly thought to be spam, please delete this
Why is my Spamassassin is reporting xxx%40 comcast. net as
URI 40 comcast. com? (without the spaces)
Thanks.
Jim
-
Jim Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UUism Networks http://www.UUism.net
Ministering to the Needs of Online UUs
Web Hosting, Email Services, Mailing Lists
-
If the SPF module can't obtain the DNS TXT record due to timeouts, does this
get reported as a SOFTFAIL?
Jim
What happens if the DNS records are not available?
We don't know if there is a TXT record or not.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: JamesDR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:03 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPF SOFTFAIL definition
Benny Pedersen
Is Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF adding the Received-SPF: Header?
I don't see it in email that received by my server, except for email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 10:56 AM
To:
Why does the longreport get truncated sometimes?
It appears to have something to do with the percent sign in the rule
description. In the example below, the percent sign at the end of the
BAYES_50 description has been replaced with the word uppercase, which is the
last part AFTER the percent
Does it mean anything with there is no test after the SPF failed: part of
the report?
I checked the from domain and it did not have a TXT or SPF record. It is
possible that it refused my DNS connection. I don't recall. I saved the
message to a file and ran spamassassin on it and it passes now.
Here is another example that I was able to isolate to a test file.
The debug looks like this:
[28763] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_hashcash_double_spend
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x98a6e80))
[28763] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for
I talked to the programmers for Mail::SPF:Query and they say this must be a
problem with Spamassassin.
Is anyone else seeing incorrect SPF_SOFTMAIL false positives?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:55 AM
ironic, that the hostmaster of the once notorious
UUnet network, spammers safe haven in the early days, is on the
spamassassing mailing list. ;-)
-Sietse
From: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 21-Jun-06 14:31
To: users
How do I debug the SPF Module during SA Operations?
I have had another email marked as SPF_SOFTFAIL during the first receipt and
the From domain does not have a TXT SPF record. When I isolated the message
and ran it again, it was processed without any errors.
I suspect that there is a problem
On 6/24/2006 11:14 AM, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
How do I debug the SPF Module during SA Operations?
I have had another email marked as SPF_SOFTFAIL during the
first receipt and
the From domain does not have a TXT SPF record. When I
isolated the message
and ran it again
Does it do any good to complain to the ISP that accepted the original email
with a forged email address that uses a domain name that I administer?
I administer a number of domain names that are being used in the forged
email addresses for spam that is sent to recipients on other servers. Some
On 6/24/2006 11:14 AM, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
How do I debug the SPF Module during SA Operations?
I have had another email marked as SPF_SOFTFAIL during the
first receipt and
the From domain does not have a TXT SPF record. When I
isolated the message
and ran
Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back to
the alleged
sender
That's not what he's asking. He wants to know whether asking ISPs to
implement SPF checks (where they don't yet check SPF) will work.
I'm not convinced that is what he meant but he wasn't clear about it
Here are examples of the Received Headers for the type of spam that are
being sent with forged email addresses for a domain that I host. These at
the last 10 bounced messages that I received, so it is fairly
representative.
Granted, 3 out of 10 messages originated in Romania. However, 3 out of
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
Here are examples of the Received Headers for the type of spam
that are being sent with forged email addresses for a domain that
I host.
The Received headers in spams cannot be trusted, except for the
Received headers put
I found my problem. I had some custom definitions that used
eval:check_razor2_range. I deleted the custom definitions and the error
went away.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Hermann
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 02:17 PM
To:
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 7.50
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 02:37 AM
To: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Razor2 Error
Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
I found my
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 90%
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 08:49 PM
To: Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Razor2 Error
Try using full rules, instead
20 matches
Mail list logo
