Hi,
running (soon to be upgraded):
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
I'm new to this list, although I'm not new to SpamAssassin. Looking at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html, and particularly at the
following DKIM tests:
DKIM_VERIFIED
On 12/23/10 7:15 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Hi,
running (soon to be upgraded):
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
I'm new to this list, although I'm not new to SpamAssassin. Looking at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html, and particularly at
the following
Hi, Mark,
On 12/23/10 7:44 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Rolf,
running (soon to be upgraded):
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
I'm new to this list, although I'm not new to SpamAssassin. Looking at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html, and particularly at the
On 1/18/11 4:58 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:55:42 +0100
Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote:
The legitimate mail that passes through my mail server comes from
hosts / networks I might not hear from again for months, by which
time I have to potentially wait 24 hours for
On 1/18/11 11:02 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:18:33 +0100
Rolf E. Sonneveldr.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl wrote:
RFC821/RFC2821/RFC5321 points out that a client has to wait a minimum
of 30 minutes before a retry attempt should be made,
That's fine. I don't care if an email
On 1/19/11 2:10 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:37:07 +0100
Rolf E. Sonneveldr.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl wrote:
I agree with you, looking at my own personal situation. However, many
mail admins (and maybe you too) are responsible for the e-mail
handling of many
On 5/19/11 8:46 AM, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Hi,
I have searched thoroughly for any information on the above
constellation, but have not found anything useful.
We have spamassassin running on a gateway server delivering mail to
users on an exchange 2010 server. Sometimes spam gets through,
Hi, Quinn,
On 9/13/11 2:39 AM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
We'll be deploying a mail server on a Rackspace cloud server, and they
suggested that because their offering is 'utility computing' the IP addresses
included are dirty (in a blacklist kind of way) and we should use a commercial
ESP such
On 9/13/11 10:27 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 9/12/2011 5:39 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
We'll be deploying a mail server on a Rackspace cloud server, and
they suggested that because their offering is 'utility computing' the
IP addresses included are dirty (in a blacklist kind of way) and we
Hi, all,
running:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1
running on Perl version 5.8.8
Can the bayes_ignore_header value contain wildcards? Like:
bayes_ignore_header X-Something-*
According to Google, this question has been asked before, but I couldn't
find an answer to the question.
/rolf
On 11/2/11 7:04 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 11:27 +0100, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Can the bayes_ignore_header value contain wildcards? Like:
bayes_ignore_header X-Something-*
Going by the M::SA::Conf docs, wildcards are not supported. A quick look
at the code confirms
On 11/23/11 6:55 PM, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
Hi,
I have an idea to discuss here with experts !
What is the main MAIN difference between spam and ham ?
...
...
Answer: spam is one way ticket and ham is 99.99% round trip !
What research can you cite for these figures? I beg to differ. Think
On 12/5/11 10:32 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:27:23 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I asked in the bug how people felt about posting to the users list
about it. I got no objections.
The complete lack of responses from anybody but you in the last 4 days
seems to be a
13 matches
Mail list logo
