Re: Spamc giving different scores

Thank you. Here is a sample spam email http://pastebin.com/m7f0d60b1 Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 18:43 -0700, the same anonymous Nabble user wrote: >> But the problem is I know that the email is absolutely spam. It should >> identify it as spam. And for some spam ema

Spam.log location

I am using mass-check to scan mbox email files in a directory. After I run mass-check,I am running hit-frequencies,but i get message like hit-frequencies cant find spam.log file no such file or directory. What is the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spam.log-locati

Re: Spam.log location

I am running like this mass-check --mbox mails where mails is a directory contains mbox mails? by defaullt mass-check should create spam.log right? mouss-4 wrote: > > cnone a écrit : >> I am using mass-check to scan mbox email files in a directory. After I >> run >> mas

Re: Spam.log location

Wooow.Thank u very much :) It worked. mouss-4 wrote: > > cnone a écrit : >> I am running like this >> mass-check --mbox mails >> where mails is a directory contains mbox mails? >> by defaullt mass-check should create spam.log right? >> > > with yo

Calling spamc and looping through files

How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email files) under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the spams in a different dir? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Calling-spamc-and-looping-through-files-tp21905369p21905369.html Sent

Re: Calling spamc and looping through files

Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not be accurate? Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote: >> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email >> files) >> under a direc

Re: Calling spamc and looping through files

Yes each file contains only one email.I have also mbox files containing multiple messages but they dont have content section.They only have headers.So I dont know how accurate results I will get. Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote: >>

Re: Calling spamc and looping through files

: > >> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote: >> > Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will >> not >> > be accurate? > > On 09.02.09 03:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >> By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do

Re: Calling spamc and looping through files

, 2009-02-09 at 03:54 -0800, cnone wrote: >> I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them. >> Most >> of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By the > > Yes, there is. Mind having a look at your configuration? The d

Spam or Not Spam :)

I have some mails that I know they are spam but spamassassin gives secores below 5.0(generally zero) for some of them. I updated the rules,changed the score threshold but spamassassin still sees them as normal emails. Am I missing something or is this normal? I have like 1800 emails but it sees on