header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the To thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu header __GK__PHARMS_02 Subject =~ /PHARMA|PHARMACY/ meta

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting John Wilcock j...@tradoc.fr: Le 22/06/2010 17:09, David Michaels a écrit : I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the To thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com: David Michaels wrote: I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the To thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org: On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Michaels wrote: Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu That looks insufficiently punctuated. Try: header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ /michae...@ucrwcu\.rwc\.uc\.edu/i

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting John Wilcock j...@tradoc.fr: Le 22/06/2010 17:09, David Michaels a écrit : I don't mean to be stupid.. and I know that this should be done with sieve but.. Is there a obvious reason this doesn't work? I think it's the To thats messing up.. header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha

Re: header To =~ question

2010-06-22 Thread David Michaels
Quoting John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org: On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Michaels wrote: header __GK__PHARMS_01 To =~ micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu header __GK__PHARMS_02 Subject =~ /PHARMA|PHARMACY/ meta TR_GK__PHARMS (__GK_PHARMS_01 __GK_PHARMS_02) I'm still not matching Count the underscores

Re: Performance problem body tests

2010-06-02 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de: Hi, with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance problem: [/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and

Re: Unable to telnet port 783

2010-04-19 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Kaleb Hosie kho...@spectraaluminum.com: I'm trying to setup SpamAssassin so that I can use a program called SpamAssassin Coach. This program is a plugin for MS Outlook that allows remote reporting to bayes and lets you mark an email as spam or ham. This is what is in my

Re: Trouble after upgrade

2010-01-26 Thread David Michaels
Quoting john ffitch j...@codemist.co.uk: After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0 water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title404 Not Found/title /headbody

Re: spamassassin bug

2010-01-11 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote: Try wiping out /var/lib/spamassassin/*, does spamassassin work then? Warren, I don't have a spamassassin directory in /var/lib/. Rich Sorry but I must insert a smiley... :)

Re: spamassassin bug

2010-01-11 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote: In /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I have init.pre, v310.pre, and v312.pre files. which would be a non-default location. Kai, Almost all SA-related files are in /etc/mail/spamassassin/; that's where

Re: Never ending spam flood www.viaXX.net?

2009-07-10 Thread David Michaels
Quoting Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com: Hi, Because of Apache.org spam filters I can't send here my message about spammers again: . . . http://pastebin.com/f6a83e9fb I'm new to this list, and may be missing something obvious, but this looks like a great candidate for a firewall DROP

Re: Level 1 setting

2009-07-07 Thread David Michaels
Quoting davidcass dav...@cassisdesign.com: I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set on the highest (1). I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it