Hi Scott,
Your question is timely. When you posted that, I wasn't aware of
problems with t/spamd_client.t, but now I have enough examples that it
is the next failure case I'm tracking down. Can you email me directly
(don't have to do the detailed back and forth to the entire mailing
list)
Hi,
Any updates on this ?
Tnx, Tuc
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:24 PM Scott Ellentuch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, as ec2-user running the make and then make test ends up failing.
> There are no issues with the port as a previous tcpdump has shown, it
> transfers data back and forth. It gets through
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-04-24 19:37:
On 2024-04-24 at 12:27:01 UTC-0400 (Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:27:01 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
For example, it matches on
* 3.1 URI_IMG_CWINDOWSNET Non-MSFT image hosted by Microsoft Azure
infra, possible phishing
this is not in
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2024-04-24 18:58:
On 24.04.24 18:50, Benny Pedersen wrote:
unsure so i ask :)
try to explain your question a bit more
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AuthRes
EVAL FUNCTIONS
header RULENAME eval:check_authres_result(method, result)
Can be
On 2024-04-24 at 12:27:01 UTC-0400 (Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:27:01 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
>> For example, it matches on
>> * 3.1 URI_IMG_CWINDOWSNET Non-MSFT image hosted by Microsoft Azure
>> infra, possible phishing
>
> this is not in spamassassin core rules
Yes, it is:
Alex skrev den 2024-04-24 15:45:
I'm using SA 4.0.1 and amavisd with postfix. I've identified a few
bounce messages in the quarantine because they weren't identified
properly. Here's one:
https://pastebin.com/RMNkcyhF
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
with no
On 24.04.24 18:50, Benny Pedersen wrote:
unsure so i ask :)
try to explain your question a bit more
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek
unsure so i ask :)
Alex skrev den 2024-04-24 15:45:
Hi,
I'm using SA 4.0.1 and amavisd with postfix. I've identified a few
bounce messages in the quarantine because they weren't identified
properly. Here's one:
https://pastebin.com/RMNkcyhF
Content preview: Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Hi,
I'm using SA 4.0.1 and amavisd with postfix. I've identified a few bounce
messages in the quarantine because they weren't identified properly. Here's
one:
https://pastebin.com/RMNkcyhF
For example, it matches on
* 3.1 URI_IMG_CWINDOWSNET Non-MSFT image hosted by Microsoft Azure
infra,
I was wrong about the severity. It does look like the error aborts the
running of the DMARC plugin when it happens, so no DMARC result will be
scored for that email.
I've committed a fix to trunk.
This bug only happens in perl versions less than 5.20.0. I see that this
case was in CentOS 7
As a practical matter, the message appears to be a warning in the log,
but the results would be correct, so it can be ignored.
Sidney Markowitz wrote on 20/04/24 9:55 am:
I've open a bug in which I noted my suspicion of what is happening.
I've open a bug in which I noted my suspicion of what is happening.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8245
If you have a sanitized email that consistently causes this to happen,
please attach it to the bug report.
As I said in the bug report, I suspect that an email that
Hello,
after updating SA 4.0.0 to 4.0.1, (CentOS 7 - Perl version 5.16.3) I get
the following message in log regarding the DMARC plugin:
plugin: eval failed: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DMARC.pm line 336.
File "DMARC.pm":
my
Pierluigi Frullani skrev den 2024-04-18 20:23:
It was simscan, that is compiled with enable-drop.
with is fine
The problem was a bad expression in blacklist_from section in local.cf
[1]
this is spam, not virus
Sorry for the noise.
if you like to reject all / drop all, why not pants ?
Pierluigi Frullani skrev den 2024-04-18 19:52:
So could it be simscan ?
super you wake up :)
configure it to pass spam, and reject virus
simscan is very old, btw
Pierluigi Frullani skrev den 2024-04-18 19:44:
I'm really fighting with spamassasin as one ( legit ) mail get spam
dropped with a 99.90 value, also if I have put, in local.cf [1] a
required hit of 100.
why is 100 required score ?
spamassassin does only tag, it does not drop
The mail is
It was simscan, that is compiled with enable-drop.
The problem was a bad expression in blacklist_from section in local.cf
Sorry for the noise.
Pierluigi
Il giorno gio 18 apr 2024 alle ore 19:56 Reindl Harald (privat) <
ha...@rhsoft.net> ha scritto:
>
>
> Am 18.04.24 um 19:52 schrieb Pierluigi
So could it be simscan ?
I'm using qmail with simscan for clamav and spamassasin.
Thanks !
Il giorno gio 18 apr 2024 alle ore 19:48 Reindl Harald (privat) <
ha...@rhsoft.net> ha scritto:
>
>
> Am 18.04.24 um 19:44 schrieb Pierluigi Frullani:
> > Hello all,
> > I'm really fighting with
Hello all,
I'm really fighting with spamassasin as one ( legit ) mail get spam
dropped with a 99.90 value, also if I have put, in local.cf a required hit
of 100.
The mail is sent from a legit gmail account ( my daughter ) to me and
contains some amazon links for stuff to buy.
I have disabled
On 16/04/2024 08:24, Michael Grant via users wrote:
I am not at all advocating people use gmail. Something like 68% of the
planet already uses it and few people like
I really wonder about that, or did they pull a trump...
I ran this June last year, the results are somewhat surprising, of
https://isbg.gitlab.io/isbg/index.html
support gmail and spamassassin
other then that i tryed to make a gentoo ebuild for it, have to retry now :)
Yes that's kinda similar! I'll have to try that! Thanks.
Michael Grant via users skrev den 2024-04-15 12:55:
Do any of you use spamassassin with a gmail account, and if so, how
are people doing it? The reason to do this is gmail's spam filtering
isn't perfect and you don't have the control you have with
spamassassin.
...
Matija
Sorry, you have misunderstood what I posted. I am not at all advocating
people use gmail. Something like 68% of the planet already uses it and
few people like you and me have the skills to host our own email. It's
not crazy for the people who use gmail or yahoo or other providers,
> >Why not just forward messages? Register a domain put some mx servers in
> front of gmails mx. I recently was testing with such relay/forward, works
> perfectly, I am only changing the envelope nothing else. DKIM, spf
> everyting perfectly working.
> >
> I'd be interested to know if anyone runs
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:48:53PM +, Michael Grant via users wrote:
> > I don't like any daemon connecting to my mail storage. Can you imagine if
> > your solution gets hacked, how much data would be compromised? I prefer
> > messages being scanned/marked before stored. I wonder if this is
From "Marc"
You can add to this, that gmail actually is also losing email and annoying is
that you can't send zip files. I am constantly asking people to give me a
different email address.
Yup! And it's not too difficult to pull messages out of the Spam folder
and put them back into Inbox.
>
> Do any of you use spamassassin with a gmail account, and if so, how are
> people doing it? The reason to do this is gmail's spam filtering isn't
> perfect
You can add to this, that gmail actually is also losing email and annoying is
that you can't send zip files. I am constantly asking
Do any of you use spamassassin with a gmail account, and if so, how are
people doing it? The reason to do this is gmail's spam filtering isn't
perfect and you don't have the control you have with spamassassin.
We built some plumbing to do this using gmail's API, and also IMAP which
can work
I believe we are in solid agreement, a few notes below explaining how...
On 2024-04-14 at 08:00:19 UTC-0400 (Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:00:19 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> Bill Cole writes:
>
>> On 2024-04-12 at 18:56:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:56:15 -0400)
>> Greg Troxel
>>
Bill Cole writes:
> On 2024-04-12 at 18:56:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:56:15 -0400)
> Greg Troxel
>
>> Bill Cole writes:
>>
>>> 1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
>>> need the support of a corroborating would-be receiver.
>>
>> Agreed. Or maybe we take
On 13/04/2024 19:27, Marc wrote:
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have
been such default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on
blacklists, and should maintain some
Absolutely, no arguments there!
After all spf -all exists already for a long time. So
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-04-13 19:42:
score USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL -2
score USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL -2
By default those each score -7.5 so a doubly-confirmed message gets the
same insane -15 as a legacy listing (def_whitelist_from_rcvd) that
doesn't require authentication. No such listings still
On 2024-04-12 at 19:26:59 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:26:59 -0700)
jdow
is rumored to have said:
> On 20240412 16:14:44, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> jdow writes:
>>
>>> One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where
>>> my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably
On 2024-04-12 at 19:01:21 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:01:21 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> Also, I'm not sure you said this, but I would say:
>
>default whitelist is dkim only
No. Existing practice is that we trust both DKIM and SPF, and I think that's
fine.
There are no
On 2024-04-12 at 18:56:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:56:15 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
>
> Bill Cole writes:
>
>> 1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
>> need the support of a corroborating
Thanks Bill, I will give this a look !
Pierluigi
Il giorno ven 12 apr 2024 alle ore 23:00 Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> ha scritto:
> On 2024-04-12 at 02:14:59 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:14:59 +0200)
> Pierluigi Frullani
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have been such
default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on blacklists, and should
maintain some degree of standard implementation to send out email. After all
spf -all exists already for a long time. So why are
On 13/04/2024 03:20, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist
entries in the official
I'm good with that, so long as likes of google are not in any whitelist
either.
I haven't been following all the anti spam stuff as much as I used to (I
have
On 20240412 16:14:44, Greg Troxel wrote:
jdow writes:
One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where
my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself
to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus
perfect rule set.
spam is bulk and
jdow writes:
> One pesky detail still exists. There is a very broad fuzzy area where
> my spam is your ham and vice versa. You could probably drive yourself
> to an early grave trying to get the perfect Bayes training plus
> perfect rule set.
spam is bulk and unsolicited. So yes the same
On 20240412 15:56:15, Greg Troxel wrote:
I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
Bill Cole writes:
1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
need the support of a corroborating would-be receiver.
Agreed. Or maybe we take requests to add only from
Also, I'm not sure you said this, but I would say:
default whitelist is dkim only
This means
All existing entries are converted to dkim as well as we can, not
worrying if they break. We'll prune ones that don't work as dkim,
and add a signing domain as we figure it out, as
I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
Bill Cole writes:
> 1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
> need the support of a corroborating would-be receiver.
Agreed. Or maybe we take requests to add only from receivers.
> 2. If senders have FPs on
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 5:51 PM, Darrell Budic wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
>> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
>> is rumored to have said:
>>
On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52
On 2024-04-12 at 02:14:59 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:14:59 +0200)
Pierluigi Frullani
is rumored to have said:
Hello all,
do you know if there is a way to have a blacklist, either for user
or
eventually for an entire server, that could be feeded via some scripts
?
If you enable the AWL
On 4/12/2024 1:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist entries in
the official SpamAssassin rules for '*@*.microsoft.com' are inappropriate. Note
that there is an entry for '*@accountprotection.microsoft.com' which is still
justified as far
The de-welcomelisting of MS marketing raises the question: Why do we maintain a
"default" welcomelist?
Based on the documentation, the original purpose of the def_welcomelist* (then
whitelist) feature set was to give a set of senders of purely legitimate mail
from FPs, with a listing having
Yesterday I received marketing spam from "Microsoft
" advertising something apparently called
"Microsoft Build" which is either a website or a marketing event: IDGAF. Spam
was sent via Marketo, which I gather is now part of the sewer we call Adobe. It
was absolutely authentic. Fully authentic
On 12.04.24 10:50, natan wrote:
I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin:
In local.cf I disable check like:
...
dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org
But in mail.log I fund still
Hi
I have problem with disabled spamhaus.org in spamassassin:
In local.cf I disable check like:
...
dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny zen.spamhaus.org
dns_query_restriction deny dbl.spamhaus.org
...
But in mail.log I fund still checking RCVD_IN_PBL, URIBL_CSS_A,
> do you know if there is a way to have a blacklist, either for user or
> eventually for an entire server, that could be feeded via some scripts ?
Yes create your own dns blacklist
> A sort of auto_learn but only for addresses ( to or from ) ?
No such thing as only for... You have to
Hello all,
do you know if there is a way to have a blacklist, either for user or
eventually for an entire server, that could be feeded via some scripts ?
A sort of auto_learn but only for addresses ( to or from ) ?
I'll trying to explain: I maintain a couple of mail servers that have a
very very
On Apr 11, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>>> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>>
>>> Darrell Budic skrev den
On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
Darrell Budic
is rumored to have said:
>> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>
>> Darrell Budic skrev den 2024-04-10 19:48:
>>
>>> Anything I’m missing?
>>
>> using amavisd ?
>>
>> then try this in
Hi,
I'm aiming to extract the domain part from the To: address field,
specifically targeting email addresses like i...@domain.com to capture just
domain.com. However, the current rule consistently captures the string
starting with @, such as @domain.com.
header __TO_DOMAIN
Perhaps just check your old notes? :-P
https://lists.apache.org/thread/6fspd1my9xjdjbz16zp7dk66vn44xccz
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:42:35PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm noticing DCC is triggering on emails with an empty body. I'd like to
> create a hash that matches messages with
Hi,
> I'm noticing DCC is triggering on emails with an empty body. I'd like to
> create a hash that matches messages with an empty body and other simple
> messages.
>
> What am I doing wrong? I've tried it with a zero-length file as well as
> one with just a few characters. It looks like I don't
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Darrell Budic skrev den 2024-04-10 19:48:
>
>> Anything I’m missing?
>
> using amavisd ?
>
> then try this in amavisd.conf:
>
>
> @spam_scanners = (
># ['SpamAssassin', 'Amavis::SpamControl::SpamAssassin'],
>['SpamdClient',
Hi,
I'm noticing DCC is triggering on emails with an empty body. I'd like to
create a hash that matches messages with an empty body and other simple
messages.
What am I doing wrong? I've tried it with a zero-length file as well as one
with just a few characters. It looks like I don't understand
Darrell Budic skrev den 2024-04-10 19:48:
Anything I’m missing?
using amavisd ?
then try this in amavisd.conf:
@spam_scanners = (
# ['SpamAssassin', 'Amavis::SpamControl::SpamAssassin'],
['SpamdClient', 'Amavis::SpamControl::SpamdClient']
);
1; # insure a defined return value
if
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 1:30 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-10 at 13:48:47 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:48:47 -0500)
> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Just checking in here that I’m not doing something wrong with the ASN plugin
>> before I
On 2024-04-10 at 13:48:47 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:48:47 -0500)
Darrell Budic
is rumored to have said:
> Just checking in here that I’m not doing something wrong with the ASN plugin
> before I file a bug on this. SpamAssassin 4.0.1 installed from cpan on Alma 9.
>
> I’ve got it configured
Just checking in here that I’m not doing something wrong with the ASN plugin
before I file a bug on this. SpamAssassin 4.0.1 installed from cpan on Alma 9.
I’ve got it configured to use the local maxmind db files, and those show up in
logs. Testing in spamassassin itself show that it finds the
Hi,
Yes, as ec2-user running the make and then make test ends up failing. There
are no issues with the port as a previous tcpdump has shown, it transfers
data back and forth. It gets through some of the tests and then it sends a
RST. Amazon only goes as far as spamassassin-3.4.3 in Amazon Linux 2
Scott Ellentuch wrote on 10/04/24 5:15 am:
Apologies, but I don't understand.
I am running "make test" as the AWS user "ec2-user" when getting these
errors. Are you saying that its an acceptable error right now, and I can
just do the "sudo make install"?
If you ran "make test" as user
Apologies, but I don't understand.
I am running "make test" as the AWS user "ec2-user" when getting these
errors. Are you saying that its an acceptable error right now, and I can
just do the "sudo make install"?
Thanks, Tuc
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:58 PM Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Scott
On 2024-04-07 at 21:40:40 UTC-0400 (Sun, 7 Apr 2024 20:40:40 -0500)
Jerry Malcolm
is rumored to have said:
But I have a co-worker that is convinced that "donotre...@xyz.com" is
a trigger for gmail's spam filters and all spam filters will score the
email higher as spam due simply to that word
no rules set in default sa-update
its unclear from perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::FromNameSpoof how
to make a local config to use it
could it be added one example config ?
i like to catch when ReplyTo is same as From:addr users should stop add
ReplyTo when not needed
On 08/04/2024 11:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Now here's my question (at least one of them)... I send the validation
email from DoNotReply
So... recommendations, please... should I change donotre...@.com to
something else, and if so, what is
Typically, noreply@... is used
Have you tried
GMail just... sucks. I have an email server in EC2 that also passes all
tests, but they insist on dumping our emails into users' spam folders.
Good luck trying to get anyone at GMail to actually do their jobs and
change whatever is causing them to mark your emails as spam. In my case,
they are
On 4/8/24 5:44 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
- make your systems transparent so that people feel they understand
what's happening and when at different stages in the process - don't
create a "corporate black box" which customers can't understand
I'll add to this and say that URLs that include
Hi
Jimmy in SA like:
There might be some Spam/Phishing emails with null sender so
spamassassin will help you block it if you configured them correctly..
header SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN Return-Path =~ /<>/
describe SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN spamik
score SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN
Hi
Problem solved: user in wbl sql add in amavis_recipients his domain
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:50, Jimmy pisze:
According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of
the Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This
specification indicates that no Delivery
According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of the
Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This
specification indicates that no Delivery Status Notification (DSN) messages
or other notifications about successful or unsuccessful delivery should be
sent in
On Monday 08 April 2024 at 05:15:58, Grant Taylor via users wrote:
> Below is my opinion, it's worth everything you paid for it. But I do
> suggest you read it and think about it for a few minutes.
For what it's worth, I thoroughly agree with these opinions.
- don't alienate people by sending
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:38, Benny Pedersen pisze:
natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31:
Apr 6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed
BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <>
-> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id:
6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888,
natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31:
Apr 6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed
BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <>
-> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id:
6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888, queued_as: 4VBDq06n69z1Q9q1,
358 ms
I check and I not
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote:
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl:
whitelisted sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17)
On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote:
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted
sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking:
6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> ->
Apr 6 01:15:08
Hi
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted
sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking:
6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> ->
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]:
Below is my opinion, it's worth everything you paid for it. But I do
suggest you read it and think about it for a few minutes.
On 4/7/24 20:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I send the validation email from donotre...@xyz.com.
I absolutely hate the do not reply type email addresses as you're trying
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 08:40:40PM -0500, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> The problem is that gmail, in particular continues to insist on
> putting these in spam folders and (theoretically) discarding some
> of them completely. Some of users swear they never get them and
And did you check that claim?
Slightly off-topic from SpamAssassin specifically. But I have a
question about certain email addresses triggering spam filter scores. I
know anybody can create any rule they want to. I just want to
understand best practices and recommendations.
I work for a medium size but growing company
Scott Ellentuch wrote on 4/04/24 9:43 am:
File attached. However, I don't see any smoking gun.
I've verified the problem. I ran sudo make test in a directory tree in
/tmp with world r-x access, and got the error in t/spamd_client.t as
well as in t/spamc_optL.t. I don't know why you didn't
Hi,
very soon we will celebrate KAM.cf Ruleset 20th Anniversary,
are there any stories about how you use the ruleset, any products that include
the rules you are aware of, or other info about how it has helped with spam and
email security ?
Glad to receive any info or story about KAM.cf
Hello,
25-dmarc.cf from corpus reads
># Requires the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DMARC plugin be loaded.
>
># Backwards compatible name (was renamed to DMARC in trunk before
4.0.0)
>ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Dmarc
The above statement evaluates to false which won't load the header
* Bill Cole [03/04/2024 10:54] :
>
> If you are using something else to
> call Spamassassin, e.g. Amavis, MIMEDefang, etc., that other software
> controls the logging.
Ah, that must be it.
I'm using spamass-milter to allow postfix to call spamassassin
Loren Wilton wrote on 4/04/24 9:26 pm:
Would it be worth adding some sort of test for this kind of thing
I started to look at where in SATest.pm it ought to go, and I found
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5529
I think from the comments I left there 17 years ago that is is
I haven't had a chance yet to read this thread carefully, but spamd when
run as root in tests will, at least in some cases, set itself to run as
user "nobody". If you do that in a subdirectory of your non-nobody user's
HOME, the usual permission configuration will not provide read access to
I haven't had a chance yet to read this thread carefully, but spamd when
run as root in tests will, at least in some cases, set itself to run as
user "nobody". If you do that in a subdirectory of your non-nobody
user's HOME, the usual permission configuration will not provide read
access to
File attached. However, I don't see any smoking gun.
Nothing in t/log
[ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251 Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1]$ ls -lR t/log
t/log:
total 0
Nothing big in iptables
[ec2-user@ip-172-31-131-251 Mail-SpamAssassin-4.0.1]$ sudo iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt
On 2024-04-03 at 14:01:44 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:44 -0400)
Scott Ellentuch
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Ok, deleted the directory and started again.
Test Summary Report
---
t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 26624 Tests: 4 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 104
Hi,
Ok, deleted the directory and started again.
Test Summary Report
---
t/spamd_client.t(Wstat: 26624 Tests: 4 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 104
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 52 tests but ran 4.
Files=217, Tests=3765, 890 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr
On 2024-04-03 at 05:49:20 UTC-0400 (Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:49:20 +0200)
Emmanuel Seyman
is rumored to have said:
Hello, all.
It's taken me nearly a year to realize this but spamassassin sends to
syslog with the local3 facility, not 'mail' as I had assumed.
The spamd daemon logs as mail as
On 2024-04-02 at 18:18:09 UTC-0400 (Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:18:09 -0400)
Scott Ellentuch
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Trying to install SA 4.0.1 from scratch. Tried via CPAN, that didn't
go
well, so trying from tarball. (Enabled SSL when doing Makefile.PL)
NEVER run 'make' as root except when
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 15:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote:
Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor
/etc/powerdns/recursor.conf
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own
recursing
Hi everyone,
As part of The ASF’s 25th anniversary campaign[1], we will be celebrating
projects and communities in multiple ways.
We invite all projects and contributors to participate in the following
ways:
* Individuals - submit your first contribution:
On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote:
Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor
/etc/powerdns/recursor.conf
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own
recursing DNS server
- you you don't use DNS server of your ISP,
W dniu 3.04.2024 o 13:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 03.04.24 11:18, natan wrote:
Where in pdns-recursor? I use pdns-recursor
/etc/powerdns/recursor.conf
This is not about pdns-recursor itself. It's about using own recursing
DNS server
- you you don't use DNS server of your ISP,
1 - 100 of 105230 matches
Mail list logo
