Re: [lessons come] Bug#63460: defining gender context.

2006-10-19 Thread Andy Jezierski
Jeroen Tebbens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/18/2006 04:27:54 PM: Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:18:18PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: These kind of spam have been getting through for quite some time now, but now they're really starting to bug me!

[lessons come] Bug#63460: defining gender context.

2006-10-18 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
These kind of spam have been getting through for quite some time now, but now they're really starting to bug me! I'm running SpamAssassin (spamd+spamc) version 3.1.3. This is the mail that is in my mailbox, so it's already processed. Running it again with spamc (still) gives me 0.3 points (same

Re: [lessons come] Bug#63460: defining gender context.

2006-10-18 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:18:18PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: These kind of spam have been getting through for quite some time now, but now they're really starting to bug me! -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score:

Re: [lessons come] Bug#63460: defining gender context.

2006-10-18 Thread Jeroen Tebbens
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:18:18PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: These kind of spam have been getting through for quite some time now, but now they're really starting to bug me! -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%