On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 11:24:35 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar
plugin?
Where can I
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
I haven't really offically released it yet.
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/
FWIW I attemped to speed read John's code in about 2 seconds but
could not determine what ti had to do with SURBLs. Maybe John
can clarify?
The DNS server
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly
registar plugin?
I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar)
is really bad (scores 5?).
A
Jeff Chan wrote:
Generally speaking whois queries is a poor way to determine
domain age, at least for client applications. The whois
infrastructure is simply not designed to support the volume of
queries required, even if locally cached.
Perhaps CRISP is part of the answer to this problem.
--On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar
plugin?
Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
registrar and it doesn't turn up.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar
plugin?
Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
registrar and it doesn't turn up.
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/
It was on an Hardin's message (id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent
yesterday to this list.
Hello
Sorry for my bad English, I'm German and soory therfore, that possibly I
tell you old stories. I've entried this list to translate an idea in
the German news group de.admin.net-abuse.mail. This ist not my idea, but
of Paul Lenz and I only want to report it.
The test contains the
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Wolfgang Uhr wrote:
The test contains the examination of all links in the body. You
have to get the date of registration and to calculate the age of
this urls.
There is a URIBL for recently-registered domains - search the list
archives for day-old bread.
Of course for
Title: RE: Age of a domain name - a new test?
Its also one of the MANY things we look at for URIBL submissions.
--Chris
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chris Santerre wrote:
Its also one of the MANY things we look at for URIBL submissions.
Good, but a domain has to be submitted to you for URIBL inclusion
before you loot at that, no?
A plugin would eliminate that on new domains.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746
Title: RE: Age of a domain name - a new test?
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Wolfgang Uhr; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Age of a domain name - a new test
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Wolfgang Uhr; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Age of a domain name - a new test?
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chris
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chris Santerre wrote:
A plugin would eliminate that on new domains.
Hell, I'd love to see it as well. Except this data alone does not
make a domain evil. It just increases the chances that it is evil.
And where would you get this info? How would you feed this list.
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Uhr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2006 19:05
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Age of a domain name - a new test?
I'm surprised people are so positive about this. Not that I'm negative
about it per se, but I have
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hell, I'd love to see it as well. Except this data alone does not make
a domain
evil. It just increases the chances that it is evil. And where would
you get this
info? How would you feed this list. dailychanges.com?
Essentially you are looking at
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 9:56:49 AM, Wolfgang Uhr wrote:
The test contains the examination of all links in the body. You have to
get the date of registration and to calculate the age of this urls.
Of course for practal use you have to cache thoose whois-requests onto a
central server and
Generally speaking whois queries is a poor way to determine
domain age, at least for client applications. The whois
infrastructure is simply not designed to support the volume of
queries required, even if locally cached. Other problems:
1. Inconsistent record formats
2. Rate limits
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly
registar plugin?
I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar)
is really bad (scores 5?).
A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not that bad
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly
registar plugin?
I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar)
is really bad (scores 5?).
A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly
registar plugin?
I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar)
is really bad (scores 5?).
A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not
21 matches
Mail list logo
