. Shouldn't be a big deal to implement
something similiar on our glue.
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29234031.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a minute and no time_limit_exceeded
reported in the report.
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29234399.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:27:57AM -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
But make sure you have SA 3.3, you should use the time_limit [2] local.cf
option. If you have latest SA and there are rules which hang, you should
identify them (can't remember the easiest way right now)
On 7/21/2010 10:03 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
On 7/21/2010 12:45 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
I've seen people post in the past that SA will demime text attachments,
and now someone says it won't.
Ted was answering a question about
working as a
workaround for now, but there may exist a more solid solution, is that
correct?
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29222479.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive
On 7/20/2010 10:46 PM, Gnanam wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt-2 wrote:
Generally, no. SA skips messages that are larger than a size that you
set in the config file. Most attachments are larger than that size.
Obviously if you have a really small attachment then it will scan it.
Thanks for that
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29222545.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/20/2010 11:55 PM, Daniel Lemke wrote:
Gnanam wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt-2 wrote:
Generally, no. SA skips messages that are larger than a size that you
set in the config file. Most attachments are larger than that size.
Obviously if you have a really small attachment then it will
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:55:58PM -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
As far as I know SpamAssassin looks for the mime type of the message, if
it's text/xyz it will perform a scan. Be careful in pushing the message size
limit! As said before, it doesn't make sense to set it to such a large
value, as
/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29223319.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/20/2010 10:16 PM, Gnanam wrote:
Does SpamAssassin perform tests/scans on attachments?
On 20.07.10 22:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Generally, no. SA skips messages that are larger than a size that you
set in the config file. Most attachments are larger than that size.
Obviously if you
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 01:12 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 7/20/2010 11:55 PM, Daniel Lemke wrote:
To hijack the thread: Does anyone know an optimum for message size limit?
Ours is set to 2MB at the moment, but we have problems when receiving large
text mails (e.g. more than 1MB) as the
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 00:08 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
How does SA scan binary attachments like .doc, .docx, .rtf, .xls, .zip,
etc. in that case?
It doesn't.
*nod*
At least, not like what you are thinking.
As you know an encoded attachment is a series of
I've seen people post in the past that SA will demime text attachments,
and now someone says it won't.
What's the real story?
It doesn't. At least, not like what you are thinking.
As you know an encoded attachment is a series of lines like:
XXHUBKJVHLSJFWSJNDL:SANFKJHSBFSLJRWKSBF
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
I've seen people post in the past that SA will demime text attachments,
and now someone says it won't.
Ted was answering a question about binary attachments, not text.
What's the real story?
It depends. On the rule definition, as
On 7/21/2010 12:45 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
I've seen people post in the past that SA will demime text attachments,
and now someone says it won't.
Ted was answering a question about binary attachments, not text.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
'body' rules are applied against the textual parts [1], decoded from
Quoted Printable or Base 64 if necessary, rendered and normalized.
[1] Textual parts depends on the MIME type, not content.
...which is why application/octet-stream spam.txt
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Moffett wrote:
I've seen people post in the past that SA will demime text attachments,
and now someone says it won't.
Ted was answering a question about binary attachments, not text.
What's the real
Hi,
Does SpamAssassin perform tests/scans on attachments?
NOTE: I'm using spamc (client for spamd) to get only the spam score of the
email message. The email message passed to spamc is assembled/prepared on
my own, which is in concert with RFC 822, produced by my web application,
which means
messages you can send scads of them. With large ones you
would take too long.
Ted
On 7/20/2010 10:16 PM, Gnanam wrote:
Hi,
Does SpamAssassin perform tests/scans on attachments?
NOTE: I'm using spamc (client for spamd) to get only the spam score of the
email message. The email message passed
:
http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29222150.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
21 matches
Mail list logo
