On 13/04/2024 19:27, Marc wrote:
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have
been such default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on
blacklists, and should maintain some
Absolutely, no arguments there!
After all spf -all exists already for a long time. So
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have been such
default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on blacklists, and should
maintain some degree of standard implementation to send out email. After all
spf -all exists already for a long time. So why are
On 13/04/2024 03:20, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist
entries in the official
I'm good with that, so long as likes of google are not in any whitelist
either.
I haven't been following all the anti spam stuff as much as I used to (I
have
On 4/12/2024 1:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist entries in
the official SpamAssassin rules for '*@*.microsoft.com' are inappropriate. Note
that there is an entry for '*@accountprotection.microsoft.com' which is still
justified as far
