On Tuesday November 9 2010 09:29:57 Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Trying 66.232.79.143...
Connected to mail.redfish-solutions.com.
554 mail.redfish-solutions.com ESMTP not accepting messages
(the message is now sitting in our queue, retrying periodically)
Just from curiosity, You mail
On 11/2/10 8:14 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Btw, this could be more gracefully handled:
$ perl -e 'use Socket6; use Net::Patricia'
Prototype mismatch: sub main::AF_INET6: none vs ()
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/Exporter.pm line 64.
Mark
That's someone else's bug:
Philip,
Try the following patch. If it works for you, I'll rerelease as 1.19:
my ($self, $ip, $bits, $data) = @_;
- $data ||= $bits ? $ip/$bits : $ip;
+ $data ||= defined $bits ? $ip/$bits : $ip;
my $packed = inet_pton(AF_INET6, $ip) || croak(invalid key);
Hmm. What I had in
Philip,
Thanks for your off-list reply. Unfortunately I cannot
reply, as your mailer is refusing connections:
$ host -t mx redfish-solutions.com
redfish-solutions.com mail is handled by 10 mail.redfish-solutions.com.
$ telnet -s mail4.ijs.si mail.redfish-solutions.com 25
Trying
On 11/8/10 5:58 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Philip,
Thanks for your off-list reply. Unfortunately I cannot
reply, as your mailer is refusing connections:
$ host -t mx redfish-solutions.com
redfish-solutions.com mail is handled by 10 mail.redfish-solutions.com.
$ telnet -s mail4.ijs.si
On 11/2/10 7:35 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
One suggestion: currently it is not possible to store 0 and 1
as a data item associated with each net, because a 0 is treated
the same as undef and replaced by the key.
And the AF_NET6 argument to new() needs to be documented in a POD.
Thanks for your
On 11/7/10 9:19 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Try the following patch. If it works for you, I'll rerelease as 1.19:
Actually, I released it as Net-Patricia-1.18_01
On Tuesday November 2 2010 16:40:49 Rob McMahon wrote:
The fix to NetAddr::IP seems to be as simple as
--- NetAddr/IP/Lite.pm.bak Fri Oct 29 00:33:06 2010
+++ NetAddr/IP/Lite.pm Tue Nov 2 15:18:05 2010
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@
if ($mval == 128) { # cidr 128
You might be able to get better results with: Net-Patricia-1.18
which I released earlier this week.
Thank you for bringing it to our attention. Now that you have added
the AF_INET6 support is became useful. I toyed with it for a while,
looks good and fast
(and a bit memory fat compared
On 10/29/10 9:18 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 10/29/10 12:11 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Sure, go ahead, can't hurt. The patch is now in the SA trunk.
Is it worth opening a ticket and putting it into the 3.3 branch too?
Mark
looks like Freebsd ports has an older version, so it should be
On Thursday 28 October 2010 17:34:28 Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I'm too late: Steve Huff already did it...
See: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=62521 .
Perfect. Thank you guys.
| Thu Oct 28 19:41:16 2010 michael [...] bizsystems.com
fixed in release 4.035
Mark
| Thu Oct 28 19:41:16 2010 michael [...] bizsystems.com
fixed in release 4.035
Actually ... maybe not fixed ... investigating
Mark
On Friday 29 October 2010 16:35:31 Mark Martinec wrote:
| Thu Oct 28 19:41:16 2010 michael [...] bizsystems.com
fixed in release 4.035
Actually ... maybe not fixed ... investigating
NetAddr::IP 4.035:
correct, this case is now fixed:
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP; print
still incorrect:
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP; print NetAddr::IP-new6(127/8)'
0:0:0:0:0:0:7F00:0/8
This seems way too ambiguos to me, isn't? How could the NetAddr::IP module
get you're instantiating an IPv6 net address, after all. That seems to me a
valid IPv6 syntax, too...
A workaround
Patch for SpamAssassin Ports, rpm's and yum? or would it hurt to do this
to 3.3.2 before it gets released?
On 10/29/10 11:01 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
A workaround for SpamAssassin is to avoid shorthand IPv4 network
specifications, both in a config file (trusted/internal networks,
if any), as
Giampaolo,
still incorrect:
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP; print NetAddr::IP-new6(127/8)'
0:0:0:0:0:0:7F00:0/8
This seems way too ambiguos to me, isn't?
No, it isn't ambiguous, it is a perfectly valid syntax for an IPv4
network, although nowadays somewhat deprecated in favour for the
On 10/29/10 12:11 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Sure, go ahead, can't hurt. The patch is now in the SA trunk.
Is it worth opening a ticket and putting it into the 3.3 branch too?
Mark
looks like Freebsd ports has an older version, so it should be ok.
pkg_info | grep NetAddr
Hi,
this morning Gentoo people liked to upgrade NetAddr::IP from 4.033 to 4.034.
People with stable systems (a Gentoo feature) actually runs SpamAssassin
3.3.1.
Soon after upgrading NetAddr::IP, a lint run reported these:
warn: netset: cannot include 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1/128 as it has already been
On Thursday 28 October 2010 14:29:41 Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
this morning Gentoo people liked to upgrade NetAddr::IP from 4.033 to
4.034.
People with stable systems (a Gentoo feature) actually runs SpamAssassin
3.3.1.
Soon after upgrading NetAddr::IP, a lint run reported these:
Looking into it...
I know NetAddr::IP recently got a re-design and probably SA have to cope
with this.
Looks like a but in NetAddr::IP 4.034, it forgets to adjust the CIDR mask
when converting an IPv4 address to an IPv6 notation:
correct (NetAddr-IP-4.033):
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP;
Looking into it...
I know NetAddr::IP recently got a re-design and probably SA have to
cope
with this.
Looks like a but in NetAddr::IP 4.034, it forgets to adjust the CIDR
mask
when converting an IPv4 address to an IPv6 notation:
correct (NetAddr-IP-4.033):
$ perl -le 'use
Mmmh.
In fact it seems they bobbed few lines from 4.033...
You sure new6 may be used with IPv4 address, huh?
If you confirm this, I can take care of reporting the bug to upstream.
Giampaolo
Aha, you're too fast! ;)
Giampaolo
Mark
Looks like a but in NetAddr::IP 4.034, it forgets to adjust the CIDR
mask when converting an IPv4 address to an IPv6 notation:
s/but/BUG/:)
correct (NetAddr-IP-4.033):
$ perl -le 'use NetAddr::IP; print NetAddr::IP-new6(127.0.0.0/8)'
0:0:0:0:0:0:7F00:0/104
wrong
If you confirm this, I can take care of reporting the bug to
upstream.
Please do so, thanks!
I'm too late: Steve Huff already did it...
See: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=62521 .
Giampaolo
Mark
24 matches
Mail list logo
