David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
could I be doing that would avoid this sort of FP?
You don't seem to be running net tests. I see headers for both SPF and
DomainKeys in that mail. These tests should have pulled the score
Loren Wilton wrote:
could I be doing that would avoid this sort of FP?
You don't seem to be running net tests. I see headers for both SPF and
DomainKeys in that mail. These tests should have pulled the score down by
some amount if you had run them.
How do you know if SPF is enabled
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
could I be doing that would avoid this sort of FP?
You don't seem to be running net tests. I see headers for both SPF and
DomainKeys in that mail. These tests should have pulled the score down by
some amount if you had
David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
could I be doing that would avoid this sort of FP?
You don't seem to be running net tests. I see headers for both SPF and
DomainKeys in that mail. These tests should have pulled the score
One of my users received a message today that landed in the spambucket. Upon
further review, it's a legit message from Paypal. In fact, SA even
recognized that it appeared to be a legit Paypal message, but since the
adjustment was a whopping -0.0 points, it wasn't enough to bring it back
below
One of my users received a message today that landed in the spambucket.
Upon
further review, it's a legit message from Paypal. In fact, SA even
recognized that it appeared to be a legit Paypal message, but since the
adjustment was a whopping -0.0 points, it wasn't enough to bring it back
