RE: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
-Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 6:16 PM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins Michael Scheidell wrote: What version of Mail::DKIM are you running

FW: RE: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
: RE: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.3 (build 8.283) X-FC-Icon-ID: 2031 X-FC-SERVER-TZ: 181272840 X-FC-MachineGenerated: true To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative

Re: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-23 Thread Bill Landry
Michael Scheidell wrote: Here is what I found out: You only need the DKIM SpamAssassin plugin activated (you don't need the DomainKeys plugin) BUT, you need BOTH Mail-DKIM ( .20) perl AND Mail-DomainKkeys perl functions loaded. I suppose the SA DKIM plugin works for both. (I am not sure

RE: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
-Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:56 AM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins Michael Scheidell wrote: Here is what I found out: You only

Re: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins

2007-07-23 Thread Bill Landry
Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:56 AM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Solved: Was: DKIM vs DomainKeys plugins Michael Scheidell wrote: Here is what I found