Re: Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-22 Thread Ruggero Ferretti - BitDesign Snc
Anyhow, you can use: /^Me again/ it looks for Me again at the beginning of the expression; it detects Me again, but also Me again Richard, etc. Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:33:36PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote: So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard.

Re: Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-22 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Evan Platt wrote: So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard. Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith Their fake Received: line is still the same. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/ BAILEY: CYCLONIC BECOMING

Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-21 Thread Evan Platt
So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard. Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith I'm almost at the point of rejecting anything with the subject Me again... Off topic: In postfix in header_checks, can I specity something at the START? ie if I say /Me again/

Re: Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-21 Thread Karl Auer
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:33 -0800, Evan Platt wrote: In postfix in header_checks, can I specity something at the START? ie if I say /Me again/Reject I only want to reject Me again Smith but not Hey, it's Me again... Put a caret at the start of the pattern: /^Me again/. To anchor

Re: Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-21 Thread Kelson
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:33:36PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote: So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard. Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith FWIW, this is why it's pointless to try keeping up with those things. There's an infinite

Re: Them spammers are getting smarter..

2006-11-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 12:33:36PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote: So used to be mail from Richard Smith, subject Me again Richard. Now they're using the last name, ie Me again Smith FWIW, this is why it's pointless to try keeping up with those things. There's an infinite number of ways they can