Fred T wrote:
Hello Steve,
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 11:56:46 PM, you wrote:
Now, I'm no expert on spam-bots, but it strikes me that the 'bots might want
to remove failed addresses
from their lists to make them more efficient. A 550 error returned at the
protocol level will immediately
Hello Steve,
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 11:56:46 PM, you wrote:
Now, I'm no expert on spam-bots, but it strikes me that the 'bots might want
to remove failed addresses
from their lists to make them more efficient. A 550 error returned at the
protocol level will immediately
notify the 'bot
I have a MRTG graph of # of spam blocked in transit and it's been
consistently 52-56k a day for years!! I always notice a huge
decrease over the weekend and it picks up big-time during the week.
From 40k on the weekend to an average peak of 54k weekdays.
I wonder if this means that the
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:07:16PM -0800, Steve Cloutier wrote:
Hi !
Call me -- whatever :-) I took a look at SpamAssassin a while back, and (at
least at the time), it seemed to scan the mailbox file after the message(s)
were received. The program (again, at the time)
with
sendmail alone. Of course, there's also the possiblity of integration with
other email packages which may have some sort of protocol level interface.
Regards,
Steve
Anyway,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Yet-another-spam-blocker--tp15911630p15918095.html
Sent from
Steve Cloutier wrote:
Hi !
I did a fair amount of sendmail tweaking, and it does indeed do quite a bit
(like checking for the existance of domains, etc.), but *not* the sort of
filtering I've been able to do with the external code.
Um, Yeah.. We know that. Many of us use SpamAssassin as
, feature
creep :-) oh, but we could
add this one thing
Regards,
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Yet-another-spam-blocker--tp15911630p15920983.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I just wanted to come up with
something that blocked spam
at the protocol level (so the spammer gets an error!!!),
That's all great.. but the reality may be that the spammer still get no error.
Spam is nowadays delivered thru 3rd party innocent bystanders, and the actual
spammer hardly is
guess, but I can think of better uses of time
:-) :-) :-)
Regards,
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Yet-another-spam-blocker--tp15911630p15923463.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in earlier
versions.
Oh well, for what it's worth!
Regards,
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Yet-another-spam-blocker--tp15911630p15911630.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo