Hi all
There is anyway to bypass a spam when SPF check results result is
equal to 'SPF_PASS'?
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
There is anyway to bypass a spam when SPF check results result is
equal to 'SPF_PASS'?
The appropriate place to do things like that is in the glue layer.
It's not a good idea to whitelist on just SPF Pass. What is to prevent a
spammer from
On tor 22 apr 2010 15:09:32 CEST, Rejaine Monteiro wrote
There is anyway to bypass a spam when SPF check results result is
equal to 'SPF_PASS'?
yes, but that rule will be silly
spammers can also just add a spf with ipv4:0.0.0.0/0 -all in it, so
atleast dont make spf pass stop just there
Sorry if I was not very clear (my english is a little poor)
in fact, I wanted to decrease the score obtained if SPF return OK
John Hardin escreveu:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
The appropriate place to do things like that is in the glue layer.
It's not a good idea to
On tor 22 apr 2010 15:20:47 CEST, John Hardin wrote
It's not a good idea to whitelist on just SPF Pass. What is to
prevent a spammer from publishing valid SPF records for their
sources and thus whitelisting themselves to you?
yep thats the problem, here i use def_whitelist_from_spf to grey
On tor 22 apr 2010 15:24:02 CEST, Rejaine Monteiro wrote
Sorry if I was not very clear (my english is a little poor)
in fact, I wanted to decrease the score obtained if SPF return OK
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
read them, search for whitelist
and
Benny Pedersen escreveu:
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
read them, search for whitelist and do test with spamassassin 21
-D -t hammsg | less //
ok, thanks for the tip!..
make sure you dont just give -100 for a possible spam msg :(
hohoho.. off
Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
Sorry if I was not very clear (my english is a little poor)
in fact, I wanted to decrease the score obtained if SPF return OK
Probably not a good idea. The last set of stats that I saw indicated
that SPF_PASS was more likely to occur in spam than in ham. This is why
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
Sorry if I was not very clear (my english is a little poor)
in fact, I wanted to decrease the score obtained if SPF return OK
My point is still valid, you don't want to reduce the score on _just_ SPF
Pass.
Take a look at whitelist_auth.
John